Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 18571–18580
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Mechanical / Manufacturing Engineering80 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the citation record was modest (no article independently cited more than 20 times), letters of support described only potential future impact rather than actual current impact, patent applications without grants do not automatically demonstrate major significance, and the work had not been widely implemented or licensed beyond the research institution.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the citation record was modest (no article independently cited more than 20 times), letters of support described only potential future impact rather than actual current impact, patent applications without grants do not automatically demonstrate major significance, and the work had not been widely implemented or licensed beyond the research institution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-24_01_B2203; source_row=19702 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner has documented his authorship of scholarly articles (including conference papers) in professional publications and thus meets this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the Petitioner has documented his authorship of scholarly articles (including conference papers) in professional publications and thus meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-24_01_B2203; source_row=19703 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the cumulative record—high-quality publications, strong citation impact, prestigious journals, expert reference letters, peer/grant review, and selection as a speaker at a major conference—established sustained acclaim and top-of-field status.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the cumulative record—high-quality publications, strong citation impact, prestigious journals, expert reference letters, peer/grant review, and selection as a speaker at a major conference—established sustained acclaim and top-of-field status.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-23_02_B2203; source_row=19698 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national/international acclaim at very top of field
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the totality of evidence, including nationally and internationally recognized awards, published material in major magazines, judging photography competitions, diverse international exhibitions, and reference letters from senior editors, demonstrated that the Petitioner has a career of acclaimed work and is among the small percentage at the very top of the photography field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the totality of evidence, including nationally and internationally recognized awards, published material in major magazines, judging photography competitions, diverse international exhibitions, and reference letters from senior editors, demonstrated that the Petitioner has a career of acclaimed work and is among the small percentage at the very top of the photography field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=19694 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the Petitioner received the top award and submitted sufficient documentary evidence including national and international media coverage showing the awards qualify as lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner received the top award and submitted sufficient documentary evidence including national and international media coverage showing the awards qualify as lesser nationally or internationally recognized awards for excellence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-23_01_B2203; source_row=19689 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c