Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The honor societies are open to students in any field and are not specific to art or rehabilitation therapy. Membership is based on undergraduate GPA rather than outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts in the relevant field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The honor societies are open to students in any field and are not specific to art or rehabilitation therapy. Membership is based on undergraduate GPA rather than outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts in the relevant field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-18_02_B2203; source_row=42398 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reserved judgment on criterion iv because, even if met, the Petitioner could satisfy at most two criteria (iv and viii), which is still fewer than the required three.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved judgment on criterion iv because, even if met, the Petitioner could satisfy at most two criteria (iv and viii), which is still fewer than the required three.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-18_01_B2203; source_row=42391 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director overlooked detailed expert letters establishing the originality and major significance of the Petitioner's pedestrian flow models and polymer-predicting software, both based on AI/machine learning. The letters were consistent, credible, uncontroverted, and supported by other evidence.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director overlooked detailed expert letters establishing the originality and major significance of the Petitioner's pedestrian flow models and polymer-predicting software, both based on AI/machine learning. The letters were consistent, credible, uncontroverted, and supported by other evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-18_05_B2203; source_row=42424 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
intent to continue work in field of extraordinary ability in the United States
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner's only evidence was a fellowship agreement that expired in September 2023; the record otherwise lacked evidence of intent to continue working in the machine learning field after obtaining permanent residence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner's only evidence was a fellowship agreement that expired in September 2023; the record otherwise lacked evidence of intent to continue working in the machine learning field after obtaining permanent residence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-18_05_B2203; source_row=42427 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Petitioner did not submit evidence in support of this criterion, did not address it in his RFE response, and did not contest the Director's determination on appeal, so it is waived.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not submit evidence in support of this criterion, did not address it in his RFE response, and did not contest the Director's determination on appeal, so it is waived.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-18_03_B2203; source_row=42405 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
field of extraordinary ability falls within sciences, arts, education, business, or athletics
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO held the Petitioner's clarified plan was not a material change and that his consulting/advisory work falls within the statutory field of 'business.'
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held the Petitioner's clarified plan was not a material change and that his consulting/advisory work falls within the statutory field of 'business.'
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-18_04_B2203; source_row=42412 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the article, with references and endnotes, was written for learned persons in the legal profession and published in a professional publication.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the article, with references and endnotes, was written for learned persons in the legal profession and published in a professional publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-18_04_B2203; source_row=42417 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the record demonstrated peer review consistent with USCIS Policy Manual examples, with the Petitioner given license to edit and revise content based on his subject-matter expertise rather than acting as a proofreader.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record demonstrated peer review consistent with USCIS Policy Manual examples, with the Petitioner given license to edit and revise content based on his subject-matter expertise rather than acting as a proofreader.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-18_04_B2203; source_row=42416 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c