Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 18591–18600

NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The director did not dispute, and AAO affirmed, that the Petitioner's research in otolaryngology and thyroid cancer carries substantial intrinsic merit. The decision does not separately analyze this prong as it was not in dispute.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The director did not dispute, and AAO affirmed, that the Petitioner's research in otolaryngology and thyroid cancer carries substantial intrinsic merit. The decision does not separately analyze this prong as it was not in dispute.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-16_01_B5203; source_row=19679
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that the Petitioner's letters with specific descriptions of research impact, citation records, editorial board memberships, conference invitations, and affiliation with a top-ranked research institution collectively demonstrated a demonstrable record of achievement with influence on the field as a whole, satisfying the third NYSDOT prong.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Petitioner's letters with specific descriptions of research impact, citation records, editorial board memberships, conference invitations, and affiliation with a top-ranked research institution collectively demonstrated a demonstrable record of achievement with influence on the field as a whole, satisfying the third NYSDOT prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-16_01_B5203; source_row=19681
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

Not disputed by the director; AAO affirmed that the proposed benefit is national in scope. The decision does not separately analyze this prong.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
Not disputed by the director; AAO affirmed that the proposed benefit is national in scope. The decision does not separately analyze this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-16_01_B5203; source_row=19680
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The plain language of the criterion requires the Petitioner's receipt of qualifying awards; the awards went to his employer companies, the awards were given for technological innovation rather than business development, and one of the awards was not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The plain language of the criterion requires the Petitioner's receipt of qualifying awards; the awards went to his employer companies, the awards were given for technological innovation rather than business development, and one of the awards was not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_01_B2203; source_row=19662
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien

Why AAO was not persuaded

Articles about the mobile communications industry or about the company's products and their revolutionary nature, even where the Petitioner is quoted, are not about the Petitioner relating to his work.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Articles about the mobile communications industry or about the company's products and their revolutionary nature, even where the Petitioner is quoted, are not about the Petitioner relating to his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_01_B2203; source_row=19664
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner has not provided an article he authored, the news articles are not scholarly, and he has not adequately argued for comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4).

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner has not provided an article he authored, the news articles are not scholarly, and he has not adequately argued for comparable evidence under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_01_B2203; source_row=19667
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or significantly high remuneration

Why AAO was not persuaded

The Petitioner did not submit documentation of his actual salary, bonuses, stock options, or other remuneration to compare against others in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The Petitioner did not submit documentation of his actual salary, bonuses, stock options, or other remuneration to compare against others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_01_B2203; source_row=19670
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

The exhibitions involved the company's tablet product, not the Petitioner's own work; further, the Petitioner is not an artist and the trade shows were not artistic exhibitions.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The exhibitions involved the company's tablet product, not the Petitioner's own work; further, the Petitioner is not an artist and the trade shows were not artistic exhibitions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_01_B2203; source_row=19668
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Eligibility requires associate membership for three years and a level of average annual exports, which are not outstanding achievements; the Petitioner also did not show full members consist of nationally or internationally recognized experts who judge outstanding achievement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Eligibility requires associate membership for three years and a level of average annual exports, which are not outstanding achievements; the Petitioner also did not show full members consist of nationally or internationally recognized experts who judge outstanding achievement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_01_B2203; source_row=19663
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO reaffirms that the reviews were about the books rather than about the Petitioner, and that he did not show the publications were professional or major trade publications or major media — citing lack of independent circulation/distribution data and rejecting reliance on the publisher's self-promotional materials.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reaffirms that the reviews were about the books rather than about the Petitioner, and that he did not show the publications were professional or major trade publications or major media — citing lack of independent circulation/distribution data and rejecting reliance on the publisher's self-promotional materials.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_02_B2203; source_row=19672
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment