Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 18601–18610
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reaffirms that the Petitioner did not provide details of what he actually did in any of the cited roles, did not show concrete outcomes from the MOU or sister-city relationship, and did not establish that his facilitation rose to a leading or critical role within the organizations as a whole.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reaffirms that the Petitioner did not provide details of what he actually did in any of the cited roles, did not show concrete outcomes from the MOU or sister-city relationship, and did not establish that his facilitation rose to a leading or critical role within the organizations as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_02_B2203; source_row=19674 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the expert letters specifically described how the petitioner's contributions were both original and of major significance, going beyond mere reiteration of regulatory language. The volume and content of over 600 citations corroborated expert assertions that her work had influenced and been built upon by other researchers across multiple subfields.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the expert letters specifically described how the petitioner's contributions were both original and of major significance, going beyond mere reiteration of regulatory language. The volume and content of over 600 citations corroborated expert assertions that her work had influenced and been built upon by other researchers across multiple subfields.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_03_B2203; source_row=19676 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded that the petitioner has demonstrated a career of acclaimed work, unusually large citation counts with evidence that other researchers have applied and built upon her findings, and expert confirmation of major significance, all of which establish she is at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded that the petitioner has demonstrated a career of acclaimed work, unusually large citation counts with evidence that other researchers have applied and built upon her findings, and expert confirmation of major significance, all of which establish she is at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_03_B2203; source_row=19678 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Whether proffered position with supervisory duties qualifies as a Schedule A professional nurse occupation
What the decision said
AAO did not affirm or reverse but concluded the duties should be reviewed against the regulatory definition of professional nurse and remanded for the Director to consider further evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not affirm or reverse but concluded the duties should be reviewed against the regulatory definition of professional nurse and remanded for the Director to consider further evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_01_B5203; source_row=19671 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Deals and relationships brokered are specific to the Petitioner's employer; the Petitioner has not articulated original work that has impacted the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Deals and relationships brokered are specific to the Petitioner's employer; the Petitioner has not articulated original work that has impacted the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_01_B2203; source_row=19666 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Emails from event organizers confirmed the Petitioner served as a judge of various competitions, and given his focus on development and commercialization of technology, he was judging work in an allied field.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
Emails from event organizers confirmed the Petitioner served as a judge of various competitions, and given his focus on development and commercialization of technology, he was judging work in an allied field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_01_B2203; source_row=19665 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reaffirms that Petitioner did not document wide distribution, that book reviews predating the petition by a decade do not establish lasting impact, and that the recommendation letters were conclusory and did not show realized significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO reaffirms that Petitioner did not document wide distribution, that book reviews predating the petition by a decade do not establish lasting impact, and that the recommendation letters were conclusory and did not show realized significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-09-11_02_B2203; source_row=19673 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c