Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner did not establish how the beneficiary fit within the organizational hierarchy or demonstrated his impact on the organizations. As a student-athlete, competing as one of several student athletes does not constitute a leading or critical role.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner did not establish how the beneficiary fit within the organizational hierarchy or demonstrated his impact on the organizations. As a student-athlete, competing as one of several student athletes does not constitute a leading or critical role. For the performance organization, the Artistic Director's letter did not explain how the beneficiary's role differentiated him from numerous other performers or his impact on the organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-12_02_B2203; source_row=19610 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the director that the newspaper coverage was insufficient. Regarding television appearances, AAO found the appearances were about the performance troupe, not about the beneficiary and his work, citing Negro-Plumpe v. Okin.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the newspaper coverage was insufficient. Regarding television appearances, AAO found the appearances were about the performance troupe, not about the beneficiary and his work, citing Negro-Plumpe v. Okin.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-12_02_B2203; source_row=19608 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO stated that a formal final merits determination was unnecessary because the petitioner did not meet the antecedent step-1 threshold, but noted that an aggregate review of all evidence nonetheless supported a finding that the petitioner had not demonstrated the requisite level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO stated that a formal final merits determination was unnecessary because the petitioner did not meet the antecedent step-1 threshold, but noted that an aggregate review of all evidence nonetheless supported a finding that the petitioner had not demonstrated the requisite level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-12_02_B2203; source_row=19611 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to show her association requires outstanding achievements of its members judged by recognized national or international experts. The IMDB profile does not establish membership in an association accepting members with outstanding achievement requirements. Foreign language documents lacked certified English translations and did not establish membership meeting the criterion's requirements.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to show her association requires outstanding achievements of its members judged by recognized national or international experts. The IMDB profile does not establish membership in an association accepting members with outstanding achievement requirements. Foreign language documents lacked certified English translations and did not establish membership meeting the criterion's requirements.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-12_01_B2203; source_row=19601 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to show that the website constitutes major media, as no information on its reach, readership, or distribution was provided. Additionally, the articles lack hallmarks of scholarly work such as citations, charts, or peer review, and instead reflect personal opinions not reviewed by others in the field.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to show that the website constitutes major media, as no information on its reach, readership, or distribution was provided. Additionally, the articles lack hallmarks of scholarly work such as citations, charts, or peer review, and instead reflect personal opinions not reviewed by others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-12_01_B2203; source_row=19604 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters and emails submitted were conclusory and lacked specific information about the petitioner's title, duties, or impact within the organization. Being one of many presenters at a regional conference does not constitute a leading or critical role. Additionally, the organization's distinguished reputation was not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters and emails submitted were conclusory and lacked specific information about the petitioner's title, duties, or impact within the organization. Being one of many presenters at a regional conference does not constitute a leading or critical role. Additionally, the organization's distinguished reputation was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-12_01_B2203; source_row=19605 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner did not demonstrate that her book, app, or public engagements had an impact on the field of psychology as a whole at a level consistent with contributions of major significance. Reference letters were conclusory, book reviews were minimal, the app release postdated the petition filing, and public engagements showed dissemination but not field-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not demonstrate that her book, app, or public engagements had an impact on the field of psychology as a whole at a level consistent with contributions of major significance. Reference letters were conclusory, book reviews were minimal, the app release postdated the petition filing, and public engagements showed dissemination but not field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-12_01_B2203; source_row=19603 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO had previously concluded on appeal that the petitioner met this criterion. Her appearance on a television show broadcast on a major television channel constitutes published material about her in major media relating to her work as a dream analyst.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO had previously concluded on appeal that the petitioner met this criterion. Her appearance on a television show broadcast on a major television channel constitutes published material about her in major media relating to her work as a dream analyst.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-12_01_B2203; source_row=19602 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that coaching students to succeed at state and regional levels, and letters attesting to the beneficiary's skills, did not demonstrate an impact in the field as a whole. The beneficiary's students' awards were not shown to have been won primarily under his tutelage, and no evidence of new training methods or techniques that impacted the broader field was provided.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that coaching students to succeed at state and regional levels, and letters attesting to the beneficiary's skills, did not demonstrate an impact in the field as a whole. The beneficiary's students' awards were not shown to have been won primarily under his tutelage, and no evidence of new training methods or techniques that impacted the broader field was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-12_02_B2203; source_row=19609 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that performances by a martial arts performer do not constitute display of work in the sense contemplated by criterion (vii), which is limited to visual arts. Post-filing performances could not be considered, and the petitioner had not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that performances by a martial arts performer do not constitute display of work in the sense contemplated by criterion (vii), which is limited to visual arts. Post-filing performances could not be considered, and the petitioner had not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-08-10_01_B2203; source_row=19598 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c