Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 18701–18710

EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media

What the decision said

The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion on this criterion on appeal, thereby abandoning the issue. AAO also noted the newspaper submitted was a self-promoting Chinese-language publication in the U.S. that had not been shown to constitute major media.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion on this criterion on appeal, thereby abandoning the issue. AAO also noted the newspaper submitted was a self-promoting Chinese-language publication in the U.S. that had not been shown to constitute major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-27_01_B2203; source_row=19565
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD1,500 citations

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's dissertation had been frequently cited by independent researchers, that her research findings had impacted school programs outside of the local school district, or that her work had otherwise affected the field of family therapy as a whole. Reference letters contained only conclusory and uncorroborated assertions.…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found no documentary evidence that the petitioner's dissertation had been frequently cited by independent researchers, that her research findings had impacted school programs outside of the local school district, or that her work had otherwise affected the field of family therapy as a whole. Reference letters contained only conclusory and uncorroborated assertions. The inapplicability of labor certification was not sufficient cause for a national interest waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-24_02_B5203; source_row=19563
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot established

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhysician

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the reference letters lacked specific examples of how the petitioner's work influenced the field as a whole, that there was no documentary evidence of frequent independent citations, that ongoing research had not yet produced demonstrated outcomes, that an institutional prize did not imply wider field impact, that assertions of surgeon shortages are handled through labor certification, and that papers not yet…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the reference letters lacked specific examples of how the petitioner's work influenced the field as a whole, that there was no documentary evidence of frequent independent citations, that ongoing research had not yet produced demonstrated outcomes, that an institutional prize did not imply wider field impact, that assertions of surgeon shortages are handled through labor certification, and that papers not yet published as of the filing date could not establish eligibility. Identical language in multiple reference letters further undermined their probative value.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-24_01_B5203; source_row=19560
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD1,500 citations

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the petitioner's work as a marriage and family therapist, particularly helping school systems allocate resources to troubled youth, is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's work as a marriage and family therapist, particularly helping school systems allocate resources to troubled youth, is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-24_02_B5203; source_row=19561
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD1,500 citations

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the petitioner's proposed work as an independent school consultant and family therapist would only benefit the specific school systems and families receiving her services, not the nation as a whole. There was no documentary evidence that any other school systems beyond the one mentioned would utilize her services, and she did not explain how her work would have implications beyond local recipients.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's proposed work as an independent school consultant and family therapist would only benefit the specific school systems and families receiving her services, not the nation as a whole. There was no documentary evidence that any other school systems beyond the one mentioned would utilize her services, and she did not explain how her work would have implications beyond local recipients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-24_02_B5203; source_row=19562
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhysician

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the petitioner's work as a surgeon and physician scientist is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's work as a surgeon and physician scientist is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-24_01_B5203; source_row=19558
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / ClinicalPhysician

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the proposed benefits of the petitioner's research concerning general surgery and breast surgery would be national in scope.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the proposed benefits of the petitioner's research concerning general surgery and breast surgery would be national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-24_01_B5203; source_row=19559
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that trade publications, company literature, and the company owner's statements collectively established that the awards were primarily attributable to the beneficiary's work as master craftsman and product development director, withdrawing the director's determination.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that trade publications, company literature, and the company owner's statements collectively established that the awards were primarily attributable to the beneficiary's work as master craftsman and product development director, withdrawing the director's determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-24_01_B2203; source_row=19554
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the aggregate evidence sufficient to show sustained national and international acclaim, including awards, published articles, and evidence that the beneficiary pioneered the introduction of oiled floors to the U.S. market through over 23 years of work in the industry.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the aggregate evidence sufficient to show sustained national and international acclaim, including awards, published articles, and evidence that the beneficiary pioneered the introduction of oiled floors to the U.S. market through over 23 years of work in the industry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-24_01_B2203; source_row=19557
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO noted that although a final merits determination was not technically required given failure at step one, its aggregate review of the evidence nevertheless supported a finding that the petitioner had not demonstrated the requisite level of expertise.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that although a final merits determination was not technically required given failure at step one, its aggregate review of the evidence nevertheless supported a finding that the petitioner had not demonstrated the requisite level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-07-22_03_B2203; source_row=19553
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment