Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 18761–18770

EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The petitioner authored a book chapter in a professional publication and an article in a trade publication, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner authored a book chapter in a professional publication and an article in a trade publication, satisfying the scholarly articles criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19498
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations

What the decision said

The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding association membership on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding association membership on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19494
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not support the required level of expertise.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19500
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

The record supports the director's conclusion: the petitioner advised nine MBA candidates on final theses and judged the work of others in an allied field as a professional association member.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The record supports the director's conclusion: the petitioner advised nine MBA candidates on final theses and judged the work of others in an allied field as a professional association member.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19496
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien

What the decision said

The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding published material on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding published material on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19495
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

What the decision said

The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding prizes and awards on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not challenge the director's conclusion regarding prizes and awards on appeal, and thus abandoned the issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-30_01_B2203; source_row=19493
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

Full-time employer relationship

Why the evidence was persuasive

Upon review of the entire record including materials submitted on appeal, AAO determined the petitioner established it more likely than not will be the beneficiary's full-time employer.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Upon review of the entire record including materials submitted on appeal, AAO determined the petitioner established it more likely than not will be the beneficiary's full-time employer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-29_01_B5203; source_row=19490
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary qualifications per labor certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

The beneficiary meets the educational and experience requirements of the labor certification as well as the advanced degree professional requirements under the Act.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The beneficiary meets the educational and experience requirements of the labor certification as well as the advanced degree professional requirements under the Act.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-29_01_B5203; source_row=19492
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

Continuing ability to pay proffered wage

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found the petitioner demonstrated continuing ability to pay based on W-2 statements showing gross pay above the proffered wage in 2013 and 2014, along with other financial documentation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner demonstrated continuing ability to pay based on W-2 statements showing gross pay above the proffered wage in 2013 and 2014, along with other financial documentation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-29_01_B5203; source_row=19491
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO stated that a final merits determination was not strictly necessary given failure at step one, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the requisite level of expertise for the classification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO stated that a final merits determination was not strictly necessary given failure at step one, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the requisite level of expertise for the classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-26_01_B2203; source_row=19487
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment