Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 18711880

NIWNIW · Well positionedNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the endeavor

What the decision said

AAO declined to consider the second prong on motion because it had not been discussed in the prior appeal decision.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to consider the second prong on motion because it had not been discussed in the prior appeal decision.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-17_03_B5203; source_row=42387
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well-positioned to advance the endeavor

What the decision said

AAO did not reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under prong one, making prong two unnecessary to the outcome.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach prong two because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under prong one, making prong two unnecessary to the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-17_02_B5203; source_row=42384
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States

What the decision said

AAO did not reach prong three because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under prong one.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach prong three because the Petitioner failed to establish national importance under prong one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-17_02_B5203; source_row=42385
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the Petitioner's research on biomarkers for early detection of breast cancer precursors has substantial merit given the disease's prevalence and mortality rates, and that its broader dissemination through publications and conferences establishes national importance.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Petitioner's research on biomarkers for early detection of breast cancer precursors has substantial merit given the disease's prevalence and mortality rates, and that its broader dissemination through publications and conferences establishes national importance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-17_04_B5203; source_row=42388
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

on balance, beneficial to the United States to waive the job offer requirement

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO withdrew the Director's determination, finding that the Petitioner's track record of successful research, his considerable expertise, and the significance of his proposed work to advance U.S. medical interests justified the waiver even assuming qualified U.S. workers are available.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's determination, finding that the Petitioner's track record of successful research, his considerable expertise, and the significance of his proposed work to advance U.S. medical interests justified the waiver even assuming qualified U.S. workers are available.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-17_04_B5203; source_row=42390
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

well positioned to advance the proposed endeavor

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO withdrew the Director's conclusion, finding that the Petitioner's medical degree, ongoing Ph.D., comprehensive research record, citation evidence, and expert letters confirming his expertise and impact collectively demonstrated he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the Director's conclusion, finding that the Petitioner's medical degree, ongoing Ph.D., comprehensive research record, citation evidence, and expert letters confirming his expertise and impact collectively demonstrated he is well positioned to advance his proposed endeavor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-17_04_B5203; source_row=42389
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial merit and national importance

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the proposed endeavor lacks national importance. Generalized business documents do not address the specific endeavor's prospective impact. The business operations benefit the Petitioner and his stakeholders but show no national or global field implications.…

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the proposed endeavor lacks national importance. Generalized business documents do not address the specific endeavor's prospective impact. The business operations benefit the Petitioner and his stakeholders but show no national or global field implications. The plan to employ 12 workers does not demonstrate significant employment potential, and being located in a HUBZone alone is insufficient absent demonstrated substantial positive economic effects. Cultural enrichment claims are incidental and not supported as having national or global implications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-16_02_B5203; source_row=42371
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner's documentation does not demonstrate that her memberships required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding that the Petitioner's documentation does not demonstrate that her memberships required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-16_01_B2203; source_row=42361
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO affirmed the Director's finding, holding that the criterion's modifier 'artistic' requires that exhibitions or showcases be artistic in nature, and the Petitioner's events (a roundtable and workshop) do not qualify. AAO also relied on Kazarian's holding that lectures and conference presentations do not constitute displays at artistic exhibitions or showcases.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the Director's finding, holding that the criterion's modifier 'artistic' requires that exhibitions or showcases be artistic in nature, and the Petitioner's events (a roundtable and workshop) do not qualify. AAO also relied on Kazarian's holding that lectures and conference presentations do not constitute displays at artistic exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-16_01_B2203; source_row=42363
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO disagreed with the Director's finding that the articles' publication was undemonstrated (confirming publication via an online scholarly index), but agreed that the Petitioner failed to show the journals constitute major trade publications, and therefore affirmed the denial on this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the Director's finding that the articles' publication was undemonstrated (confirming publication via an online scholarly index), but agreed that the Petitioner failed to show the journals constitute major trade publications, and therefore affirmed the denial on this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-16_01_B2203; source_row=42362
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
Back to assessment