Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
AAO found the petitioner's book did not equate to a 'scholarly article' under the regulation, was printed in only 150 copies, and the petitioner did not establish it was a professional or major trade publication. The article in the Russian magazine relied on Wikipedia for circulation evidence, which carried no evidentiary weight, and was not established to be aimed at experts or of interest to scholars.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner's book did not equate to a 'scholarly article' under the regulation, was printed in only 150 copies, and the petitioner did not establish it was a professional or major trade publication. The article in the Russian magazine relied on Wikipedia for circulation evidence, which carried no evidentiary weight, and was not established to be aimed at experts or of interest to scholars.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=19438 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
While AAO did not contest that age-limited youth awards may qualify, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his particular awards were nationally or internationally recognized. Media coverage in publications with limited, regional reach was insufficient to establish national or international recognition.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While AAO did not contest that age-limited youth awards may qualify, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that his particular awards were nationally or internationally recognized. Media coverage in publications with limited, regional reach was insufficient to establish national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=19433 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the expert letters were conclusory and did not specifically describe how the petitioner's fighting style, victories, or book had made a measurable and significant impact on the field of wrestling. Achievements and skills alone do not constitute original contributions of major significance, and the letters lacked specific examples of field-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the expert letters were conclusory and did not specifically describe how the petitioner's fighting style, victories, or book had made a measurable and significant impact on the field of wrestling. Achievements and skills alone do not constitute original contributions of major significance, and the letters lacked specific examples of field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=19437 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the criterion was not met but noted the regulation does not require material to be completely about the petitioner. Most submitted articles did not qualify because they were not about the petitioner (only listing his name), appeared in publications with limited regional circulation, or the petitioner failed to provide evidence that the publications constituted major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the criterion was not met but noted the regulation does not require material to be completely about the petitioner. Most submitted articles did not qualify because they were not about the petitioner (only listing his name), appeared in publications with limited regional circulation, or the petitioner failed to provide evidence that the publications constituted major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=19435 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's favorable determination on de novo review. The submitted letters were conclusory, lacked specificity about membership selection criteria and the role of nationally/internationally recognized experts in judging outstanding achievements, and the record did not contain bylaws or official documentation of the organization's membership criteria.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's favorable determination on de novo review. The submitted letters were conclusory, lacked specificity about membership selection criteria and the role of nationally/internationally recognized experts in judging outstanding achievements, and the record did not contain bylaws or official documentation of the organization's membership criteria.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=19434 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the director's favorable determination. Although the petitioner held a judge title and a letter stated he judged major international events, the record lacked evidence detailing what duties he performed as a judge. Evidence of officiating at a match without proof of actually evaluating or judging the skills of participants was insufficient.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's favorable determination. Although the petitioner held a judge title and a letter stated he judged major international events, the record lacked evidence detailing what duties he performed as a judge. Evidence of officiating at a match without proof of actually evaluating or judging the skills of participants was insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=19436 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the supporting letters described the petitioner as effective and dedicated but did not show influence on the field as a whole; her useful skills and unique background are matters for the labor certification process, not the NIW; the tenure award has only local/institutional significance.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the supporting letters described the petitioner as effective and dedicated but did not show influence on the field as a whole; her useful skills and unique background are matters for the labor certification process, not the NIW; the tenure award has only local/institutional significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-12_02_B5203; source_row=19445 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate evidence does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold of three criteria, but noted in dicta that the aggregate evidence does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-06-12_01_B2203; source_row=19439 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c