Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 18871–18880
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
Timeliness and excusability of late motion filing
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the petitioner failed to show the delay was reasonable and beyond her control. The support letter she claimed to be waiting for was not actually filed with the motion, was dated three days before the motion was signed, and its absence was not the basis for the underlying denial.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner failed to show the delay was reasonable and beyond her control. The support letter she claimed to be waiting for was not actually filed with the motion, was dated three days before the motion was signed, and its absence was not the basis for the underlying denial.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-22_02_B5203; source_row=19377 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Physics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concludes that the petitioner's post-graduation publications derive from follow-up to his doctoral work, not from his subsequent employers' projects, and that he has not shown that his post-graduation employment will continue to impact the field. A draft, unpublished manuscript and proposals from his employer do not establish ongoing influential research.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes that the petitioner's post-graduation publications derive from follow-up to his doctoral work, not from his subsequent employers' projects, and that he has not shown that his post-graduation employment will continue to impact the field. A draft, unpublished manuscript and proposals from his employer do not establish ongoing influential research.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-22_01_B5203; source_row=19376 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO did not reach the merits of this issue because the petitioner failed to respond to the NOID requesting additional evidence on the beneficiary's educational credentials and qualifying employment.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not reach the merits of this issue because the petitioner failed to respond to the NOID requesting additional evidence on the beneficiary's educational credentials and qualifying employment.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-22_03_B5203; source_row=19378 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
proffered position requires an advanced degree professional
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO raised in its NOID that the position does not appear to require an advanced-degree professional; the petitioner did not respond, leaving the issue against it.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO raised in its NOID that the position does not appear to require an advanced-degree professional; the petitioner did not respond, leaving the issue against it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-19_02_B5203; source_row=19372 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the record lacked sufficient evidence of ability to pay; petitioner did not respond to the NOID's request for tax returns or audited financials and the beneficiary's W-2.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record lacked sufficient evidence of ability to pay; petitioner did not respond to the NOID's request for tax returns or audited financials and the beneficiary's W-2.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-19_02_B5203; source_row=19373 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the petitioner's past record of achievement was insufficient to justify a waiver; mere professional employment and local recognition do not establish the requisite degree of influence on the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner's past record of achievement was insufficient to justify a waiver; mere professional employment and local recognition do not establish the requisite degree of influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-12_01_B5203; source_row=19371 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
What the decision said
AAO did not revisit the first prong in this motion, having previously found it satisfied; the analysis focuses entirely on the second and third prongs.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not revisit the first prong in this motion, having previously found it satisfied; the analysis focuses entirely on the second and third prongs.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-12_01_B5203; source_row=19369 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's awards and recognitions had at most local, regional, or institutional significance, and her post-filing training and certifications could not be considered for eligibility purposes. No evidence showed her work influenced education at the national level.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's awards and recognitions had at most local, regional, or institutional significance, and her post-filing training and certifications could not be considered for eligibility purposes. No evidence showed her work influenced education at the national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-12_01_B5203; source_row=19370 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c