Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 18911–18920
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO excluded 23 articles for lack of full certified translations, found items 1-4 were not 'about' the beneficiary relating to her work, and found that the one qualifying article (item 5) was not shown to be in a professional or major trade publication or major media. The petitioner relied on Wikipedia for circulation evidence, which AAO gave no evidentiary weight.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO excluded 23 articles for lack of full certified translations, found items 1-4 were not 'about' the beneficiary relating to her work, and found that the one qualifying article (item 5) was not shown to be in a professional or major trade publication or major media. The petitioner relied on Wikipedia for circulation evidence, which AAO gave no evidentiary weight.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=19327 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherManager
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the step-1 threshold of three criteria. The AAO noted in dicta that aggregate evidence does not support a finding of the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the step-1 threshold of three criteria. The AAO noted in dicta that aggregate evidence does not support a finding of the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-05_02_B2203; source_row=19337 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that a letter from the Director of Ancient Art, Historical, and Scientific Museums described the beneficiary as lead art restorer with final decision-making authority and responsibility for weighing restoration risks, with specific projects mentioned, sufficient to establish a leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that a letter from the Director of Ancient Art, Historical, and Scientific Museums described the beneficiary as lead art restorer with final decision-making authority and responsibility for weighing restoration risks, with specific projects mentioned, sufficient to establish a leading or critical role for an organization with a distinguished reputation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=19329 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO stated it need not conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO stated it need not conduct a formal final merits determination because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=19331 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence establishing that the beneficiary meets the plain language of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v).
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence establishing that the beneficiary meets the plain language of 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=19328 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
satisfaction of at least three regulatory criteria
What the decision said
AAO found that the petitioner had effectively abandoned the issue of satisfying at least three of the regulatory criteria by failing to address them in his prior motion, and the new evidence did not address AAO's previously identified concerns.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner had effectively abandoned the issue of satisfying at least three of the regulatory criteria by failing to address them in his prior motion, and the new evidence did not address AAO's previously identified concerns.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-05_03_B2203; source_row=19339 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The employment letters from the Philippine medical centers describe OR/ER staff nurse duties rather than supervisory duties, and thus do not establish 60 months of qualifying experience in the proffered position.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The employment letters from the Philippine medical centers describe OR/ER staff nurse duties rather than supervisory duties, and thus do not establish 60 months of qualifying experience in the proffered position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-01_02_B5203; source_row=19326 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years post-baccalaureate experience in proffered position (nurse supervisor)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO affirmed the finding (correcting only the priority date) that the beneficiary failed to establish qualifying experience. None of the employer letters showed nurse supervisor duties, and several letters had dates inconsistent with the labor certification that were not resolved by independent objective evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the finding (correcting only the priority date) that the beneficiary failed to establish qualifying experience. None of the employer letters showed nurse supervisor duties, and several letters had dates inconsistent with the labor certification that were not resolved by independent objective evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-01_01_B5203; source_row=19325 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree requirement for proffered position
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the director analyzed the wrong position (registered nurse instead of nurse supervisor). DOL data shows management-level nursing positions increasingly require a graduate degree, so the labor certification's master's degree requirement for nurse supervisor qualifies as an advanced degree professional position.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the director analyzed the wrong position (registered nurse instead of nurse supervisor). DOL data shows management-level nursing positions increasingly require a graduate degree, so the labor certification's master's degree requirement for nurse supervisor qualifies as an advanced degree professional position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-01_01_B5203; source_row=19323 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Schedule A Group I qualification (professional nurse)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the director that the nurse supervisor position does not qualify as Schedule A because its duties are focused on administration rather than patient care, making them substantially different from professional nursing duties. The unpublished decision cited by petitioner is not binding and concerns a nurse practitioner, not a nurse supervisor.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the nurse supervisor position does not qualify as Schedule A because its duties are focused on administration rather than patient care, making them substantially different from professional nursing duties. The unpublished decision cited by petitioner is not binding and concerns a nurse practitioner, not a nurse supervisor.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-05-01_01_B5203; source_row=19324 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c