Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 18931–18940
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner's motion failed to address AAO's prior finding on national scope. NYSDOT itself cites schoolteachers as an example of a meritorious occupation that lacks national scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner's motion failed to address AAO's prior finding on national scope. NYSDOT itself cites schoolteachers as an example of a meritorious occupation that lacks national scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-29_01_B5203; source_row=19311 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
benefit to the national interest substantially greater than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO finds no documentary evidence that petitioner's work has impacted the field beyond her classroom. Service-center approvals are not binding, and meeting the No Child Left Behind 'highly qualified teacher' definition does not entitle a teacher to an NIW.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO finds no documentary evidence that petitioner's work has impacted the field beyond her classroom. Service-center approvals are not binding, and meeting the No Child Left Behind 'highly qualified teacher' definition does not entitle a teacher to an NIW.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-29_01_B5203; source_row=19312 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Advanced degree qualification (five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience)
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the beneficiary's foreign equivalent bachelor's degree plus the required five years of progressive post-baccalaureate work experience, all accrued prior to the priority date, satisfies the advanced degree requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the beneficiary's foreign equivalent bachelor's degree plus the required five years of progressive post-baccalaureate work experience, all accrued prior to the priority date, satisfies the advanced degree requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-28_01_B5203; source_row=19309 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the petitioner was a pioneer in preference market research, with expert letters confirming he was the first to study incentive mechanisms of information markets, and companies such as a major corporation implementing his research findings, establishing original contributions of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner was a pioneer in preference market research, with expert letters confirming he was the first to study incentive mechanisms of information markets, and companies such as a major corporation implementing his research findings, establishing original contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-28_01_B2203; source_row=19306 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that in the aggregate the petitioner's original contributions, company reliance on his work, publication in highly-ranked journals, citation impact, and judging experience established sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that in the aggregate the petitioner's original contributions, company reliance on his work, publication in highly-ranked journals, citation impact, and judging experience established sustained national or international acclaim and that he is among the small percentage at the very top of his field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-28_01_B2203; source_row=19308 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AIProfessor
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner submitted insufficient evidence that the chapter has a distinguished reputation. The chapter only became seriously active in 2010 and welcomes members in the top 15% of their class, which does not establish the requisite distinguished reputation. Additionally, the record did not show the beneficiary performed a leading or critical role for the organization as a whole.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner submitted insufficient evidence that the chapter has a distinguished reputation. The chapter only became seriously active in 2010 and welcomes members in the top 15% of their class, which does not establish the requisite distinguished reputation. Additionally, the record did not show the beneficiary performed a leading or critical role for the organization as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-27_03_B2203; source_row=19302 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that offers of admission are not prizes or awards, and the applicant pool for degree programs is limited to students or entry-level professionals, not the field as a whole. The petitioner also abandoned the challenge to the director's finding on student awards by not raising it on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that offers of admission are not prizes or awards, and the applicant pool for degree programs is limited to students or entry-level professionals, not the field as a whole. The petitioner also abandoned the challenge to the director's finding on student awards by not raising it on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-27_03_B2203; source_row=19299 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c