Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 18971–18980

NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing EngineeringPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's research benefits would be national in scope.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's research benefits would be national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-22_01_B5203; source_row=19272
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mechanical / Manufacturing EngineeringPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's research in mechanical engineering is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's research in mechanical engineering is in an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-22_01_B5203; source_row=19271
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Social SciencesBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree or equivalent (five years progressive post-baccalaureate experience)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO affirmed the director's finding. The petitioner's letters from her employer confirmed approximately 5.5 years of special education teaching but did not indicate progressive experience. Furthermore, the petitioner abandoned the issue on appeal by not addressing it.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed the director's finding. The petitioner's letters from her employer confirmed approximately 5.5 years of special education teaching but did not indicate progressive experience. Furthermore, the petitioner abandoned the issue on appeal by not addressing it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-15_02_B5203; source_row=19270
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

salary demonstrating exceptional ability (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(D))

Why AAO was not persuaded

The burden is on the petitioner to compare his earnings to the level of compensation ordinarily encountered in his field; he documented only $13,231.20 over two years and offered no comparative data.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The burden is on the petitioner to compare his earnings to the level of compensation ordinarily encountered in his field; he documented only $13,231.20 over two years and offered no comparative data.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=19266
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

ten years of full-time experience (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(B))

Why AAO was not persuaded

The submitted affidavit was not from an employer, employer letters lacked dates or documented only short stints, and the W-2 amounts are inconsistent with full-year employment. Academic experience falls under a different criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The submitted affidavit was not from an employer, employer letters lacked dates or documented only short stints, and the W-2 amounts are inconsistent with full-year employment. Academic experience falls under a different criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=19264
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

recognition for achievements and significant contributions (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(F))

Why AAO was not persuaded

The scholarship description had no attributed source and did not match the named fund, and the 2014 certificate post-dates filing and was not shown to constitute qualifying recognition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The scholarship description had no attributed source and did not match the named fund, and the 2014 certificate post-dates filing and was not shown to constitute qualifying recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=19268
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree or baccalaureate plus 5 years progressive experience

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner could not have earned five years of post-baccalaureate experience given that his studies ran until winter 2010, and he did not contest the director's finding on appeal.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner could not have earned five years of post-baccalaureate experience given that his studies ran until winter 2010, and he did not contest the director's finding on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=19269
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

official academic record (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A))

Why AAO was not persuaded

The university did not award the degree until 2014, after the May 28, 2013 filing date, and the petitioner provided no support for his assertion that the university wrongly withheld it earlier. Eligibility must be established at filing.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The university did not award the degree until 2014, after the May 28, 2013 filing date, and the petitioner provided no support for his assertion that the university wrongly withheld it earlier. Eligibility must be established at filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=19263
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWexceptional ability otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

exceptional ability other

membership in professional associations (8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(E))

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner did not show the cited entities are professional associations; conferences were product-user gatherings, the developer registration is a resource site, and the online profile is on a business networking site.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not show the cited entities are professional associations; conferences were product-user gatherings, the developer registration is a resource site, and the online profile is on a business networking site.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=19267
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other22 citations

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Neither the journalism organization nor the university research supervisors' association required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts; the claimed lifetime membership was also not supported by evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Neither the journalism organization nor the university research supervisors' association required outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts; the claimed lifetime membership was also not supported by evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-04-14_02_B2203; source_row=19255
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment