Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 19031–19040

EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner did not show specific duties, title, or impact establishing a leading or critical role, did not show the organizations had a distinguished reputation, and could not rely on a post-filing event.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not show specific duties, title, or impact establishing a leading or critical role, did not show the organizations had a distinguished reputation, and could not rely on a post-filing event.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-23_02_B2203; source_row=19213
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner did not show that the associations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts, nor that one of them is even a membership association rather than a credit database.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner did not show that the associations require outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts, nor that one of them is even a membership association rather than a credit database.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-23_02_B2203; source_row=19209
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the petitioner's evidence of reviewing dissertations and peer reviewing journals was sufficient to satisfy this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's evidence of reviewing dissertations and peer reviewing journals was sufficient to satisfy this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-23_01_B2203; source_row=19202
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Biomedical / Life Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the petitioner's multiple published articles, abstracts, and conference proceedings were sufficient to establish eligibility under this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the petitioner's multiple published articles, abstracts, and conference proceedings were sufficient to establish eligibility under this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-23_01_B2203; source_row=19204
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner failed to show the impact of her book, public engagements, or app in the field; reference letters and quotations were conclusory or unauthenticated, and the app post-dated filing.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner failed to show the impact of her book, public engagements, or app in the field; reference letters and quotations were conclusory or unauthenticated, and the app post-dated filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-23_02_B2203; source_row=19211
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination but noted in the alternative the evidence would not satisfy the standard.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination but noted in the alternative the evidence would not satisfy the standard.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-23_02_B2203; source_row=19215
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that the television appearance on a major channel constituted published material about her in major media relating to her work in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the television appearance on a major channel constituted published material about her in major media relating to her work in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-23_02_B2203; source_row=19210
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO independently found the record deficient because it lacked required financial documentation for 2012, and the beneficiary's W-2 and earnings statements showed pay below the proffered wage and were not the type of initial evidence required by the regulation.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO independently found the record deficient because it lacked required financial documentation for 2012, and the beneficiary's W-2 and earnings statements showed pay below the proffered wage and were not the type of initial evidence required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-20_01_B5203; source_row=19198
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary qualifications per labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO affirmed the Director's finding, noting unresolved inconsistencies in employment dates and full-time status across multiple claimed experience periods, overlap of claimed employment with full-time academic study, doubts about the credibility of certain employer letters, and the absence of adequate evidence of four years of IBM Cognos 8.1/8.2 experience.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO affirmed the Director's finding, noting unresolved inconsistencies in employment dates and full-time status across multiple claimed experience periods, overlap of claimed employment with full-time academic study, doubts about the credibility of certain employer letters, and the absence of adequate evidence of four years of IBM Cognos 8.1/8.2 experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-20_01_B5203; source_row=19197
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty

Why AAO was not persuaded

The experience letters on record document less than five years of qualifying progressive experience. Additionally, the beneficiary's claimed experience at one employer from July 1995 overlaps with his enrollment at the Indian university through May 1998, further reducing creditable experience. Total documented experience amounts to four years and nine months.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The experience letters on record document less than five years of qualifying progressive experience. Additionally, the beneficiary's claimed experience at one employer from July 1995 overlaps with his enrollment at the Indian university through May 1998, further reducing creditable experience. Total documented experience amounts to four years and nine months.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-19_01_B5203; source_row=19195
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment