Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19051–19060
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot established
Case facts
Environment / EnergyFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Membership
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that peer-reviewer service is not membership in an association and is properly addressed under criterion (iv). The cited requirements (graduate degree or 10 years of experience, three research products, etc.) do not constitute outstanding achievements, and the translations contained material added text not present in the Spanish originals.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that peer-reviewer service is not membership in an association and is properly addressed under criterion (iv). The cited requirements (graduate degree or 10 years of experience, three research products, etc.) do not constitute outstanding achievements, and the translations contained material added text not present in the Spanish originals.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-16_03_B2203; source_row=19184 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed step 1, but indicated that an aggregate review would also fail, citing the absence of evidence of acclaim activity after 2012.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to make a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed step 1, but indicated that an aggregate review would also fail, citing the absence of evidence of acclaim activity after 2012.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-16_03_B2203; source_row=19190 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot established
Case facts
Environment / EnergyFaculty
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's role as professor and conference-extension coordinator did not constitute a leading or critical role; her director duties at one university were leading but the regulation's plural 'organizations or establishments' requires more than one distinguished organization, which she did not show.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's role as professor and conference-extension coordinator did not constitute a leading or critical role; her director duties at one university were leading but the regulation's plural 'organizations or establishments' requires more than one distinguished organization, which she did not show. AAO also found insufficient evidence that the institute had a distinguished reputation outside the university.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-16_03_B2203; source_row=19188 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the comparative salary data inconsistent and unreliable; comparisons limited to one university or to median wages do not establish a high salary in the field. Petitioner did not provide objective evidence comparing her research/consulting fees to others in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the comparative salary data inconsistent and unreliable; comparisons limited to one university or to median wages do not establish a high salary in the field. Petitioner did not provide objective evidence comparing her research/consulting fees to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-16_03_B2203; source_row=19189 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-16_02_B2203; source_row=19183 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not support a finding of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-16_01_B2203; source_row=19179 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the beneficiary's work appeared in exhibitions, satisfying the plain language of the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the beneficiary's work appeared in exhibitions, satisfying the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-16_01_B2203; source_row=19177 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The support letters contain conclusory and unsubstantiated assertions that the beneficiary influenced other designers, but do not identify specific professionals who followed the beneficiary's methods or provide documentary evidence that the beneficiary's work impacted the field as a whole rather than individual clients.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The support letters contain conclusory and unsubstantiated assertions that the beneficiary influenced other designers, but do not identify specific professionals who followed the beneficiary's methods or provide documentary evidence that the beneficiary's work impacted the field as a whole rather than individual clients.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-16_01_B2203; source_row=19176 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the beneficiary performed a critical role as an art director and marketing consultant for organizations with distinguished reputations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the beneficiary performed a critical role as an art director and marketing consultant for organizations with distinguished reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-16_01_B2203; source_row=19178 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c