Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19081–19090
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding, concluding that none of the submitted articles met the criterion. Translation certifications were defective, publications were not shown to be professional or major trade publications, some material was self-promotional advertising rather than journalistic coverage, and Wikipedia-sourced circulation data was unreliable.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding, concluding that none of the submitted articles met the criterion. Translation certifications were defective, publications were not shown to be professional or major trade publications, some material was self-promotional advertising rather than journalistic coverage, and Wikipedia-sourced circulation data was unreliable.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-11_01_B2203; source_row=19150 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding. Performing music at concerts does not constitute 'display' of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases within the meaning of criterion (vii), which is limited to the visual arts. The petitioner is a performing musician, not a visual artist.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding. Performing music at concerts does not constitute 'display' of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases within the meaning of criterion (vii), which is limited to the visual arts. The petitioner is a performing musician, not a visual artist.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-11_01_B2203; source_row=19153 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner did not establish that his role as a guest performer in a 'Sunday Brunch Series' was leading or critical for the jazz club, and the evidence failed to show the venue has a distinguished reputation beyond unsubstantiated assertions and self-promotional material.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not establish that his role as a guest performer in a 'Sunday Brunch Series' was leading or critical for the jazz club, and the evidence failed to show the venue has a distinguished reputation beyond unsubstantiated assertions and self-promotional material.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-11_01_B2203; source_row=19154 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner misidentified compact disc sales as evidence for this criterion; that evidence is addressed under criterion (x). No documentary evidence shows the petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner misidentified compact disc sales as evidence for this criterion; that evidence is addressed under criterion (x). No documentary evidence shows the petitioner authored scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-11_01_B2203; source_row=19152 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
Letters of support commented on the petitioner's skills and talent but failed to identify specific examples of how his work influenced the jazz field or constituted contributions of major significance. Vague, solicited letters from colleagues without specific examples of field-wide impact are insufficient.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Letters of support commented on the petitioner's skills and talent but failed to identify specific examples of how his work influenced the jazz field or constituted contributions of major significance. Vague, solicited letters from colleagues without specific examples of field-wide impact are insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-11_01_B2203; source_row=19151 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed at step 1, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence would also fail a final merits review.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed at step 1, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence would also fail a final merits review.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-11_01_B2203; source_row=19156 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the beneficiary's foreign MS in Engineering from Taiwan equivalent to a U.S. master's in mechanical engineering, qualifying him as an advanced degree professional.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the beneficiary's foreign MS in Engineering from Taiwan equivalent to a U.S. master's in mechanical engineering, qualifying him as an advanced degree professional.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-04_01_B5203; source_row=19149 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found the publisher was not established as a form of major media due to lack of corroborating evidence, that plays do not constitute 'scholarly articles' (which are nonfictional prose, peer-reviewed, etc.), and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that scholarly publications about playwriting do not exist, precluding reliance on comparable evidence.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the publisher was not established as a form of major media due to lack of corroborating evidence, that plays do not constitute 'scholarly articles' (which are nonfictional prose, peer-reviewed, etc.), and that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that scholarly publications about playwriting do not exist, precluding reliance on comparable evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=19145 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found the petitioner received only a nomination (not an actual award), lacked primary evidence of receipt of any award for the play, failed to establish his individual receipt of a group award, and did not demonstrate that either achievement was nationally or internationally recognized. The fellowship was found to be for artistic development rather than recognition for excellence in the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the petitioner received only a nomination (not an actual award), lacked primary evidence of receipt of any award for the play, failed to establish his individual receipt of a group award, and did not demonstrate that either achievement was nationally or internationally recognized. The fellowship was found to be for artistic development rather than recognition for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=19142 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c