Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19091–19100
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO stated it need not conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner failed step 1, but noted in the alternative that aggregate review of the evidence does not show the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO stated it need not conduct a full final merits determination because the petitioner failed step 1, but noted in the alternative that aggregate review of the evidence does not show the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=19147 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO conducted a cursory aggregate review in the alternative and found the petitioner had not demonstrated the sustained national or international acclaim and level of expertise required, though formal step-2 analysis was not reached because step 1 was not satisfied.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO conducted a cursory aggregate review in the alternative and found the petitioner had not demonstrated the sustained national or international acclaim and level of expertise required, though formal step-2 analysis was not reached because step 1 was not satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-02_01_B2203; source_row=19141 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The expert letters described the petitioner's research findings and their potential implications but failed to demonstrate that those findings had already made a significant impact in the field. Citation records showed only moderate citation at the individual article level, and download statistics were not equivalent to citations.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The expert letters described the petitioner's research findings and their potential implications but failed to demonstrate that those findings had already made a significant impact in the field. Citation records showed only moderate citation at the individual article level, and download statistics were not equivalent to citations. The book's citation level was notable but the record lacked information establishing it as an original contribution.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-02_01_B2203; source_row=19139 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO affirmed the director's finding, noting that evidence of starring roles in critically acclaimed shows performed at distinguished festivals supports satisfaction of this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO affirmed the director's finding, noting that evidence of starring roles in critically acclaimed shows performed at distinguished festivals supports satisfaction of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=19146 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO agreed that the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence, including material from identified publications, to establish that he meets this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed that the petitioner submitted sufficient evidence, including material from identified publications, to establish that he meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-03-02_02_B2203; source_row=19143 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's competitive history and player awards did not qualify because she sought classification as a coach, not a player, and coaching and competitive athletics are not the same area of expertise. Her player awards were also not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized, and awards won by her student athletes do not constitute prizes or awards received by the petitioner herself.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's competitive history and player awards did not qualify because she sought classification as a coach, not a player, and coaching and competitive athletics are not the same area of expertise. Her player awards were also not shown to be nationally or internationally recognized, and awards won by her student athletes do not constitute prizes or awards received by the petitioner herself.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=19132 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
Reference letters from colleagues, athletes, and parents of student athletes showed the petitioner's positive impact on individual athletes but did not demonstrate original contributions of major significance to the sport of table tennis as a whole. Letters were largely conclusory and did not identify specific original contributions or explain how those contributions rose to a level of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Reference letters from colleagues, athletes, and parents of student athletes showed the petitioner's positive impact on individual athletes but did not demonstrate original contributions of major significance to the sport of table tennis as a whole. Letters were largely conclusory and did not identify specific original contributions or explain how those contributions rose to a level of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=19134 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c