Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19101–19110
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
A post-filing interview could not be used to establish eligibility. One article was not about the petitioner but about a student athlete, with the petitioner only mentioned in a photo caption. Two articles in another publication were about young athletes she trained, and the publication was not shown to be professional/major trade or major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
A post-filing interview could not be used to establish eligibility. One article was not about the petitioner but about a student athlete, with the petitioner only mentioned in a photo caption. Two articles in another publication were about young athletes she trained, and the publication was not shown to be professional/major trade or major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=19133 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
one-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner did not assert or demonstrate receipt of a major internationally recognized award such as a Nobel Prize or Olympic medal, and did not challenge the director's conclusion on this point on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not assert or demonstrate receipt of a major internationally recognized award such as a Nobel Prize or Olympic medal, and did not challenge the director's conclusion on this point on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=19131 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner pointed to a reference letter with conclusory statements and employment offers as comparable evidence, but AAO found these insufficient. Employment offers are a separate requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(5) and do not substitute for evidence of extraordinary ability.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner pointed to a reference letter with conclusory statements and employment offers as comparable evidence, but AAO found these insufficient. Employment offers are a separate requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(5) and do not substitute for evidence of extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=19136 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to formally conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed the step-1 threshold, but noted in dicta that the aggregate evidence did not support the requisite level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to formally conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner failed the step-1 threshold, but noted in dicta that the aggregate evidence did not support the requisite level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=19137 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
What the decision said
The director concluded the petitioner did not meet this criterion. On appeal, the petitioner did not contest the director's conclusion, and AAO deemed this issue abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The director concluded the petitioner did not meet this criterion. On appeal, the petitioner did not contest the director's conclusion, and AAO deemed this issue abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-27_01_B2203; source_row=19135 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary holds qualifying advanced degree from accredited U.S. institution
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that the Act and regulations require a nationally recognized degree, which can only be assured through accreditation by a USDE-recognized accreditation agency. The institution's certification by CPCA and FCPC and its legal authorization under Florida law do not satisfy this federal standard.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the Act and regulations require a nationally recognized degree, which can only be assured through accreditation by a USDE-recognized accreditation agency. The institution's certification by CPCA and FCPC and its legal authorization under Florida law do not satisfy this federal standard. Whether degrees from the institution are accepted by local Florida government offices is irrelevant to meeting the federal regulatory requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-26_02_B5203; source_row=19125 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
five years experience as International Business Manager
Why AAO was not persuaded
The three third-party statements did not come from employers or trainers of the beneficiary as an International Business Manager as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1). The statements addressed employment not claimed on the labor certification, characterized the beneficiary's role as an investor rather than an employee, and were internally inconsistent with each other and with the beneficiary's prior immigration filings.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The three third-party statements did not come from employers or trainers of the beneficiary as an International Business Manager as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1). The statements addressed employment not claimed on the labor certification, characterized the beneficiary's role as an investor rather than an employee, and were internally inconsistent with each other and with the beneficiary's prior immigration filings.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-26_03_B5203; source_row=19130 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The beneficiary's Master of Arts degree was in an unspecified field with no evidence of graduate coursework, and the evaluator's explanation that the degree is awarded as a mark of status conflicted with the beneficiary's own resume suggesting postgraduate studies. Therefore the primary educational requirement could not be confirmed.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's Master of Arts degree was in an unspecified field with no evidence of graduate coursework, and the evaluator's explanation that the degree is awarded as a mark of status conflicted with the beneficiary's own resume suggesting postgraduate studies. Therefore the primary educational requirement could not be confirmed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-26_03_B5203; source_row=19129 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Net income for the priority year was below the combined proffered wages of $73,400; no audited financial statements were provided to assess net current assets; and under the totality of circumstances analysis per Sonegawa, the startup petitioner failed to demonstrate sufficient financial activity or growth to support the job offers.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Net income for the priority year was below the combined proffered wages of $73,400; no audited financial statements were provided to assess net current assets; and under the totality of circumstances analysis per Sonegawa, the startup petitioner failed to demonstrate sufficient financial activity or growth to support the job offers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-26_03_B5203; source_row=19127 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
bona fide job opportunity available to U.S. workers
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner had no legal right to the proposed job location, was not operational as of the priority date, lacked a business license or tax registration, was not licensed as a real estate company, and employed no workers. The attempted lease assignment was drafted only in response to the RFE and was not executed by required parties.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner had no legal right to the proposed job location, was not operational as of the priority date, lacked a business license or tax registration, was not licensed as a real estate company, and employed no workers. The attempted lease assignment was drafted only in response to the RFE and was not executed by required parties.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-26_03_B5203; source_row=19128 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c