Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 19121–19130

EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the petitioner could not rely on comparable evidence because 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v) specifically recognizes artistic contributions, making the criterion readily applicable. Even assuming comparable evidence was proper, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that any increase in German tourism was attributable to his individual original contributions rather than his employer's broader marketing methodology.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner could not rely on comparable evidence because 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(3)(v) specifically recognizes artistic contributions, making the criterion readily applicable. Even assuming comparable evidence was proper, the petitioner failed to demonstrate that any increase in German tourism was attributable to his individual original contributions rather than his employer's broader marketing methodology.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=19110
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material in major media or professional/trade publications

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the publications the petitioner submitted were local or regional in reach, not major media. Evidence supporting their status derived heavily from Wikipedia and answers.com, which carry no evidentiary weight. International internet accessibility alone is not an indicator of major media status. The petitioner also failed to establish that any publication was a professional or major trade publication.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the publications the petitioner submitted were local or regional in reach, not major media. Evidence supporting their status derived heavily from Wikipedia and answers.com, which carry no evidentiary weight. International internet accessibility alone is not an indicator of major media status. The petitioner also failed to establish that any publication was a professional or major trade publication.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=19109
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications or major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the petitioner abandoned his claims under this criterion on appeal by making only a passing reference without addressing the scholarly nature of his articles. Regardless, the record supported the director's finding that the general interest articles are not scholarly.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner abandoned his claims under this criterion on appeal by making only a passing reference without addressing the scholarly nature of his articles. Regardless, the record supported the director's finding that the general interest articles are not scholarly.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=19111
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

What the decision said

AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner did not meet the antecedent threshold of three criteria, while noting in dicta that the aggregate evidence would not support the classification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO explicitly declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner did not meet the antecedent threshold of three criteria, while noting in dicta that the aggregate evidence would not support the classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=19114
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with distinguished reputation

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's work as a voice-over actor and starring lead in award-winning international films established that he meets this criterion.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's work as a voice-over actor and starring lead in award-winning international films established that he meets this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=19112
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or significantly high remuneration in relation to others in the field

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's letters and pay stubs established his high remuneration relative to others in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner's letters and pay stubs established his high remuneration relative to others in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-23_01_B2203; source_row=19113
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

consistency between proffered worksite and beneficiary's location

Why AAO was not persuaded

Inconsistency between the labor certification's worksite address and the beneficiary's address (with no stated travel or remote-work provision) raises a bona fide job offer concern that must be resolved on remand.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Inconsistency between the labor certification's worksite address and the beneficiary's address (with no stated travel or remote-work provision) raises a bona fide job offer concern that must be resolved on remand.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-19_01_B5203; source_row=19108
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary's experience matches labor certification requirements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Experience letters describe general programmer/analyst duties but do not show the beneficiary acquired the specific skills (ASP.NET, VB.NET, C#.NET, etc.) listed in Part H.14 of the labor certification.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Experience letters describe general programmer/analyst duties but do not show the beneficiary acquired the specific skills (ASP.NET, VB.NET, C#.NET, etc.) listed in Part H.14 of the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-19_01_B5203; source_row=19107
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay proffered wages

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the record does not establish ability to pay, noting the missing 2013 tax return and the absence of evidence regarding 17 additional approved I-140 beneficiaries.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the record does not establish ability to pay, noting the missing 2013 tax return and the absence of evidence regarding 17 additional approved I-140 beneficiaries.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-19_01_B5203; source_row=19106
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

final merits determination

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO offers an alternative finding that, even on aggregate review, the petitioner has not demonstrated extraordinary ability.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO offers an alternative finding that, even on aggregate review, the petitioner has not demonstrated extraordinary ability.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-18_01_B2203; source_row=19103
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment