Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner did not provide documentary evidence demonstrating that any of the three identified awards (a Youngsters viola award, a youth lutherie contest award limited to school pupils, and a 4th national lutherie contest second prize) are nationally or internationally recognized. Translations were inadequate or showed the youth competitions were limited in scope.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not provide documentary evidence demonstrating that any of the three identified awards (a Youngsters viola award, a youth lutherie contest award limited to school pupils, and a 4th national lutherie contest second prize) are nationally or internationally recognized. Translations were inadequate or showed the youth competitions were limited in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-18_01_B2203; source_row=19099 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
Although the employer enjoys a distinguished reputation, the letters do not assert the petitioner performs in a leading role within the organizational hierarchy and do not describe what impact his work has had on the company such that the role is critical.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Although the employer enjoys a distinguished reputation, the letters do not assert the petitioner performs in a leading role within the organizational hierarchy and do not describe what impact his work has had on the company such that the role is critical.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-18_01_B2203; source_row=19102 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary meets minimum requirements stated on the labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO held that the labor certification at Part H requires a master's degree and does not permit any combination of education and experience, so evaluations relying on bachelor's-plus-five-years cannot establish qualification.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that the labor certification at Part H requires a master's degree and does not permit any combination of education and experience, so evaluations relying on bachelor's-plus-five-years cannot establish qualification. Additionally, claimed experience as a trainee/volunteer/job-trainee was not certified on the ETA 9089 and did not establish work as an occupational therapist, and even if counted would not amount to five years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-18_01_B5203; source_row=19105 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
advanced degree (or foreign equivalent) qualification under section 203(b)(2)
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the beneficiary's degree is a bachelor's degree per EDGE, and rejected counsel's argument that the undergraduate thesis demonstrates an advanced degree. AAO also rejected reliance on California licensing/NBCOT certification as proof of equivalency.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the beneficiary's degree is a bachelor's degree per EDGE, and rejected counsel's argument that the undergraduate thesis demonstrates an advanced degree. AAO also rejected reliance on California licensing/NBCOT certification as proof of equivalency.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-18_01_B5203; source_row=19104 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The article submitted on appeal is about a competition rather than the petitioner, the certified translation does not include the portion bearing his name, and the translation lacks the publication date and author as required by the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The article submitted on appeal is about a competition rather than the petitioner, the certified translation does not include the portion bearing his name, and the translation lacks the publication date and author as required by the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-18_01_B2203; source_row=19100 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
What the decision said
The petitioner did not assert eligibility under this criterion before the director and did not contest the director's findings on appeal, so AAO treats any claim as abandoned.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not assert eligibility under this criterion before the director and did not contest the director's findings on appeal, so AAO treats any claim as abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-18_01_B2203; source_row=19101 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The EDGE database, which AAO considers a reliable peer-reviewed source, characterizes the Spanish 'Titulo de Ingeniero' earned after five years as comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a master's. The petitioner did not respond to the RFE to reconcile this discrepancy.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The EDGE database, which AAO considers a reliable peer-reviewed source, characterizes the Spanish 'Titulo de Ingeniero' earned after five years as comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a master's. The petitioner did not respond to the RFE to reconcile this discrepancy.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-13_01_B5203; source_row=19097 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary qualifying experience per 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The experience letter failed the regulatory requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) because it did not provide a specific description of duties performed by the alien. The petitioner did not submit a compliant replacement letter after the RFE.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The experience letter failed the regulatory requirement under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(1) because it did not provide a specific description of duties performed by the alien. The petitioner did not submit a compliant replacement letter after the RFE.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-13_01_B5203; source_row=19098 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The tax returns do not separate fashion producer salary from partnership income and CEO compensation. The wage comparisons used either general occupational categories not closely matching the petitioner's duties, stale data, or average rather than high-end salary benchmarks, none of which properly demonstrate that the petitioner earned a high salary relative to others performing similar work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The tax returns do not separate fashion producer salary from partnership income and CEO compensation. The wage comparisons used either general occupational categories not closely matching the petitioner's duties, stale data, or average rather than high-end salary benchmarks, none of which properly demonstrate that the petitioner earned a high salary relative to others performing similar work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-12_01_B2203; source_row=19095 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
There is no documentary evidence showing the petitioner's own work was displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases. Performing marketing responsibilities, scheduling photographers and models, and offering consultations do not meet the elements of this criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
There is no documentary evidence showing the petitioner's own work was displayed at artistic exhibitions or showcases. Performing marketing responsibilities, scheduling photographers and models, and offering consultations do not meet the elements of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-02-12_01_B2203; source_row=19093 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c