Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19201–19210
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO conducted an alternative aggregate review and found the evidence insufficient to demonstrate the level of expertise required, though it noted this was not a formal final merits determination under Kazarian.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO conducted an alternative aggregate review and found the evidence insufficient to demonstrate the level of expertise required, though it noted this was not a formal final merits determination under Kazarian.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=19026 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Economics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's modest citation record (21 total, average ~1.24 per paper), undocumented peer review participation, graduate-student-era awards of undemonstrated significance, and unsupported claims in letters—including an inflated citation count of 'more than thirty'—did not establish influence on the field.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's modest citation record (21 total, average ~1.24 per paper), undocumented peer review participation, graduate-student-era awards of undemonstrated significance, and unsupported claims in letters—including an inflated citation count of 'more than thirty'—did not establish influence on the field. The 2005 non-precedent decision cited by the petitioner was not binding and did not establish that any specific citation threshold mandates approval.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-23_01_B5203; source_row=19029 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concurred with the director, finding that the reference letters and documentary evidence established the petitioner's critical roles with organizations having distinguished reputations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concurred with the director, finding that the reference letters and documentary evidence established the petitioner's critical roles with organizations having distinguished reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-23_01_B2203; source_row=19025 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The Asset Purchase Agreement explicitly precluded assumption of the predecessor's liabilities, the predecessor continued to operate after the asset sale, and employed the beneficiary until November 2012. The petitioner purchased only certain assets (name, goodwill, equipment) rather than the essential rights and obligations necessary to carry on the business.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The Asset Purchase Agreement explicitly precluded assumption of the predecessor's liabilities, the predecessor continued to operate after the asset sale, and employed the beneficiary until November 2012. The petitioner purchased only certain assets (name, goodwill, equipment) rather than the essential rights and obligations necessary to carry on the business. Additionally, the predecessor remained an active corporation well after the agreement, confirming the absence of a true business transfer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-23_02_B5203; source_row=19030 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary meets labor certification requirements by priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
The labor certification required 60 months of experience as an architect and did not allow experience in an alternate occupation. The beneficiary's CAD drafter experience with the petitioner could not be counted. The totality of documented qualifying architect experience was only about 19 months, falling well short of the 60 months required.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The labor certification required 60 months of experience as an architect and did not allow experience in an alternate occupation. The beneficiary's CAD drafter experience with the petitioner could not be counted. The totality of documented qualifying architect experience was only about 19 months, falling well short of the 60 months required.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-23_02_B5203; source_row=19032 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's own W-2s show wages paid to the beneficiary were below the proffered wage for 2012. The petitioner's 2012 net income ($15,670) and net current assets ($0) were insufficient to cover the shortfall. Since the predecessor was not a valid successor-in-interest, its financial records could not be used.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's own W-2s show wages paid to the beneficiary were below the proffered wage for 2012. The petitioner's 2012 net income ($15,670) and net current assets ($0) were insufficient to cover the shortfall. Since the predecessor was not a valid successor-in-interest, its financial records could not be used. The AAO also rejected prorating, the use of total assets, and found no Sonegawa-type circumstances warranting favorable exercise of discretion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-23_02_B5203; source_row=19031 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO stated that a final merits determination was not required because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO stated that a final merits determination was not required because the step-1 threshold was not met, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-20_01_B2203; source_row=19017 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The beneficiary's 2012 and 2013 earnings were only slightly above the 50th percentile for sound engineers per BLS data. The employment agreement postdated the petition filing and could not establish eligibility at filing. Even at the $47.50 hourly rate, maximum projected annual earnings fell only between the 50th and 75th percentile. Geographic wage comparisons and above-average earnings were also insufficient.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's 2012 and 2013 earnings were only slightly above the 50th percentile for sound engineers per BLS data. The employment agreement postdated the petition filing and could not establish eligibility at filing. Even at the $47.50 hourly rate, maximum projected annual earnings fell only between the 50th and 75th percentile. Geographic wage comparisons and above-average earnings were also insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-20_01_B2203; source_row=19016 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c