Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19221–19230
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The evidence submitted was local in nature and the petitioner failed to show her individual work had impact beyond her employer's school. The NCLBA argument was rejected because the statute does not address immigration or create any waiver for teachers, and Congress's intent was explicitly to apply, not waive, the job offer requirement to professionals including teachers.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The evidence submitted was local in nature and the petitioner failed to show her individual work had impact beyond her employer's school. The NCLBA argument was rejected because the statute does not address immigration or create any waiver for teachers, and Congress's intent was explicitly to apply, not waive, the job offer requirement to professionals including teachers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-16_04_B5203; source_row=19011 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest served to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate that her work has influenced the field or that her impact extends beyond her local school, and therefore she did not establish that her contributions substantially exceed those of U.S. workers with the same minimum qualifications.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate that her work has influenced the field or that her impact extends beyond her local school, and therefore she did not establish that her contributions substantially exceed those of U.S. workers with the same minimum qualifications.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-16_02_B5203; source_row=18999 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
The AAO did not dispute that the petitioner's work in elementary special education has substantial intrinsic merit; the issue was not before it on this prong.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO did not dispute that the petitioner's work in elementary special education has substantial intrinsic merit; the issue was not before it on this prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-16_02_B5203; source_row=18997 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's evidence showed only local contributions to her school. The data collection system she was involved with was still under development and its potential national impact was speculative. The NCLBA did not create a blanket waiver for teachers, and the petitioner's qualifications as a 'Highly Qualified Teacher' did not establish national scope.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's evidence showed only local contributions to her school. The data collection system she was involved with was still under development and its potential national impact was speculative. The NCLBA did not create a blanket waiver for teachers, and the petitioner's qualifications as a 'Highly Qualified Teacher' did not establish national scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-16_02_B5203; source_row=18998 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters do not identify specific achievements or contributions to the industry or field; an invention is not itself evidence of recognition; and a patent application is not recognition for achievements or significant contributions.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The letters do not identify specific achievements or contributions to the industry or field; an invention is not itself evidence of recognition; and a patent application is not recognition for achievements or significant contributions.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-16_01_B5203; source_row=18996 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner's representative effectively conceded his work was confined to the local geographic area because of H-1B restrictions and that he sought the waiver to widen scope nationally; future, hypothetical national reach is speculative and cannot satisfy the prong.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner's representative effectively conceded his work was confined to the local geographic area because of H-1B restrictions and that he sought the waiver to widen scope nationally; future, hypothetical national reach is speculative and cannot satisfy the prong.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-16_03_B5203; source_row=19008 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
recognition for achievements and significant contributions
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record contains no recognition by governmental entities or professional/business organizations; the support letters were generally not from peers, did not identify specific achievements, and student successes are not recognition of the petitioner himself. Director initially granted this criterion in the RFE but reversed in the denial.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contains no recognition by governmental entities or professional/business organizations; the support letters were generally not from peers, did not identify specific achievements, and student successes are not recognition of the petitioner himself. Director initially granted this criterion in the RFE but reversed in the denial.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-16_03_B5203; source_row=19005 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years of full-time experience
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's finding because petitioner's own statement is not an employer letter, the one employer letter covered less than ten years and did not establish full-time status, and the foreign-language letter from the Ensemble was uncertified and did not show paid full-time employment.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding because petitioner's own statement is not an employer letter, the one employer letter covered less than ten years and did not establish full-time status, and the foreign-language letter from the Ensemble was uncertified and did not show paid full-time employment.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-16_03_B5203; source_row=19001 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c