Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19231–19240
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
benefit to national interest substantially greater than an available U.S. worker (past record of achievement/influence on the field)
Why AAO was not persuaded
Letters were from people with local ties to the petitioner; evidence of student competition scores and superior teaching methods was anecdotal and did not show his methods had been adopted by others or that his students consistently outperformed comparable peers; reputation was limited to the local cultural community.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
Letters were from people with local ties to the petitioner; evidence of student competition scores and superior teaching methods was anecdotal and did not show his methods had been adopted by others or that his students consistently outperformed comparable peers; reputation was limited to the local cultural community.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-16_03_B5203; source_row=19009 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Per EDGE/AACRAO, the Indian M.Sc. (IT) is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree only, not a master's degree. The credential evaluations were unpersuasive: the first evaluator failed to analyze the beneficiary's bachelor's degree or compare coursework to U.S.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Per EDGE/AACRAO, the Indian M.Sc. (IT) is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree only, not a master's degree. The credential evaluations were unpersuasive: the first evaluator failed to analyze the beneficiary's bachelor's degree or compare coursework to U.S. master's programs; the second evaluator's general equivalency formula lacked peer-reviewed supporting material, and neither evaluation was accompanied by the beneficiary's bachelor's degree or transcripts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-13_02_B5203; source_row=18990 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Continuing ability to pay proffered wage from priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to provide complete tax returns for 2010 and 2013, and bank statements contradicted the claimed monthly expense figure. As a sole proprietorship sponsoring multiple beneficiaries, the petitioner must show ability to cover all combined proffered wages; shortfalls were identified in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. The totality-of-circumstances analysis under Sonegawa did not overcome these deficiencies.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to provide complete tax returns for 2010 and 2013, and bank statements contradicted the claimed monthly expense figure. As a sole proprietorship sponsoring multiple beneficiaries, the petitioner must show ability to cover all combined proffered wages; shortfalls were identified in 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2013. The totality-of-circumstances analysis under Sonegawa did not overcome these deficiencies.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-13_01_B5203; source_row=18989 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Experience gained with the petitioner cannot count under Delitizer absent a showing of dissimilarity, the beneficiary's affidavits are self-serving and unsupported, and even crediting them the total documented experience is less than five years.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Experience gained with the petitioner cannot count under Delitizer absent a showing of dissimilarity, the beneficiary's affidavits are self-serving and unsupported, and even crediting them the total documented experience is less than five years.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-13_03_B5203; source_row=18992 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The credential evaluations establish that the beneficiary holds the equivalent of two U.S. bachelor's degrees, not a Master's degree, and the labor certification does not allow substitution of education and experience.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The credential evaluations establish that the beneficiary holds the equivalent of two U.S. bachelor's degrees, not a Master's degree, and the labor certification does not allow substitution of education and experience.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-13_03_B5203; source_row=18991 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO reversed the director's positive finding, concluding that a violinist performing is not displaying his work in the same sense as a visual artist displaying work in a gallery. Performances do not satisfy this criterion, which covers tangible pieces of art on display at exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the director's positive finding, concluding that a violinist performing is not displaying his work in the same sense as a visual artist displaying work in a gallery. Performances do not satisfy this criterion, which covers tangible pieces of art on display at exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-12_01_B2203; source_row=18972 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found it unnecessary to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found it unnecessary to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed the step-1 threshold, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-12_01_B2203; source_row=18974 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's self-published blog is not peer-reviewed or scholarly and has not been shown to have a following consistent with major media. The petitioner failed to establish how his blog equates to major media.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's self-published blog is not peer-reviewed or scholarly and has not been shown to have a following consistent with major media. The petitioner failed to establish how his blog equates to major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-12_01_B2203; source_row=18971 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner failed to submit primary evidence of receipt of the award. The biography reference alone does not establish national or international recognition of the award in the field, and evidence submitted for the first time on appeal after an RFE pointed to the deficiency cannot be considered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to submit primary evidence of receipt of the award. The biography reference alone does not establish national or international recognition of the award in the field, and evidence submitted for the first time on appeal after an RFE pointed to the deficiency cannot be considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-12_01_B2203; source_row=18969 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c