Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
Evidence shows employment or involvement with organizations rather than membership requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts; serving as secretary is a position, not a membership level.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Evidence shows employment or involvement with organizations rather than membership requiring outstanding achievements judged by recognized national or international experts; serving as secretary is a position, not a membership level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-06_02_B2203; source_row=18924 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
On de novo review, AAO withdraws the director's finding because music performances are audible, not visual displays; the criterion is limited to visual arts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
On de novo review, AAO withdraws the director's finding because music performances are audible, not visual displays; the criterion is limited to visual arts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-06_02_B2203; source_row=18928 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original scientific, scholarly, artistic, athletic, or business-related contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's resume without corroborating evidence constitutes unsubstantiated assertions. Her various positions have not been shown to fall within or advance the field of anthropology. Her animal rescue work was not established as anthropology. Her 1994 fieldwork, though anthropological, lacked evidence of any impact in the field, and none of her reference letters mentioned it.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's resume without corroborating evidence constitutes unsubstantiated assertions. Her various positions have not been shown to fall within or advance the field of anthropology. Her animal rescue work was not established as anthropology. Her 1994 fieldwork, though anthropological, lacked evidence of any impact in the field, and none of her reference letters mentioned it.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-06_01_B2203; source_row=18919 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The website cited by the petitioner is not a professional or major trade publication, no evidence was submitted showing its traffic or reach, and the content relates to animal rescue—not anthropology, the field in which the petitioner claims expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The website cited by the petitioner is not a professional or major trade publication, no evidence was submitted showing its traffic or reach, and the content relates to animal rescue—not anthropology, the field in which the petitioner claims expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-06_01_B2203; source_row=18918 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the evidence in aggregate would not support the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the step-one threshold of at least three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the evidence in aggregate would not support the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2015-01-06_03_B2203; source_row=18940 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary qualifications per labor certification (advanced degree)
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the totality of the record, including NOID and RFE responses, established that the beneficiary more likely than not possessed all the required education, training, and experience as of the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the totality of the record, including NOID and RFE responses, established that the beneficiary more likely than not possessed all the required education, training, and experience as of the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-31_01_B5203; source_row=18916 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary's qualifying experience by priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
At least two of the six experience letters were confirmed false by their purported signatories. Under Matter of Ho, doubt cast on any part of a petitioner's proof warrants reevaluation of all remaining evidence. The petitioner failed to respond to the AAO's notice affording an opportunity to rebut, leaving no competent evidence to overcome the doubts.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
At least two of the six experience letters were confirmed false by their purported signatories. Under Matter of Ho, doubt cast on any part of a petitioner's proof warrants reevaluation of all remaining evidence. The petitioner failed to respond to the AAO's notice affording an opportunity to rebut, leaving no competent evidence to overcome the doubts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-30_01_B5203; source_row=18914 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Fraud or willful misrepresentation of material fact by petitioner
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the Director's fraud finding unsupported because (1) the Director denied the petition rather than acting upon the misrepresentations, negating a required element of fraud; (2) the evidence indicated the beneficiary, not the petitioner, obtained and provided the false letters; and (3) the record lacked sufficient evidence of materiality.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the Director's fraud finding unsupported because (1) the Director denied the petition rather than acting upon the misrepresentations, negating a required element of fraud; (2) the evidence indicated the beneficiary, not the petitioner, obtained and provided the false letters; and (3) the record lacked sufficient evidence of materiality.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-30_01_B5203; source_row=18915 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's USPTO Form 892 (Notice of References Cited) reflected citations by the patent examiner, not citations by others in the field. The petitioner submitted only a pending patent application, not evidence that his invention was cited, licensed, or used by others. AAO also held that the plural language of criterion (v) requires more than one original contribution of major significance.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's USPTO Form 892 (Notice of References Cited) reflected citations by the patent examiner, not citations by others in the field. The petitioner submitted only a pending patent application, not evidence that his invention was cited, licensed, or used by others. AAO also held that the plural language of criterion (v) requires more than one original contribution of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_01_B2203; source_row=18896 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c