Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19301–19310
EB-1AEB-1A · Major awardNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Major award
one-time major internationally recognized award
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner did not submit evidence of a one-time achievement (a major, internationally recognized award).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not submit evidence of a one-time achievement (a major, internationally recognized award).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_01_B2203; source_row=18894 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner submitted screenshots from patent-tracking websites showing his patent application. AAO found this documentation was not 'about' the petitioner and did not qualify as published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media relating to his work.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted screenshots from patent-tracking websites showing his patent application. AAO found this documentation was not 'about' the petitioner and did not qualify as published material in professional or major trade publications or other major media relating to his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_01_B2203; source_row=18895 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner argued his 'running machine' should constitute comparable evidence because his achievements were 'latest and yet to come in public.' AAO rejected this, finding that the petitioner failed to explain why the regulatory criteria did not apply to inventors, and that inability to meet a criterion does not establish that the criterion is inapplicable to the occupation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner argued his 'running machine' should constitute comparable evidence because his achievements were 'latest and yet to come in public.' AAO rejected this, finding that the petitioner failed to explain why the regulatory criteria did not apply to inventors, and that inability to meet a criterion does not establish that the criterion is inapplicable to the occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_01_B2203; source_row=18898 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO stated that a full final merits determination was unnecessary given the failure at step 1, but added in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO stated that a full final merits determination was unnecessary given the failure at step 1, but added in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_01_B2203; source_row=18899 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner claimed articles were published on certain websites but acknowledged the copies were unavailable or missing. AAO found no documentary evidence of authored scholarly articles in the record.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner claimed articles were published on certain websites but acknowledged the copies were unavailable or missing. AAO found no documentary evidence of authored scholarly articles in the record.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_01_B2203; source_row=18897 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the Executive Director's letter did not specify that the petitioner's role was leading or critical, nor did the petitioner provide comparative evidence of her role relative to other performers. Additionally, the petitioner failed to establish that the organization or its productions had a distinguished reputation. The foreign language documents were excluded for lack of translation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the Executive Director's letter did not specify that the petitioner's role was leading or critical, nor did the petitioner provide comparative evidence of her role relative to other performers. Additionally, the petitioner failed to establish that the organization or its productions had a distinguished reputation. The foreign language documents were excluded for lack of translation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_02_B2203; source_row=18905 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's CD lacked evidence of impact or influence on the music industry, the second album had not yet been released and eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and the support letters were vague and conclusory without demonstrating how contributions rose to major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's CD lacked evidence of impact or influence on the music industry, the second album had not yet been released and eligibility must be established at the time of filing, and the support letters were vague and conclusory without demonstrating how contributions rose to major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_02_B2203; source_row=18904 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed to satisfy the threshold of three criteria, but noted in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not demonstrate the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_02_B2203; source_row=18906 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding, concluding that partial translations lack probative value under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), multiple items were missing required title/date/author information, and the petitioner failed to establish that any publication qualified as professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's favorable finding, concluding that partial translations lack probative value under 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(3), multiple items were missing required title/date/author information, and the petitioner failed to establish that any publication qualified as professional or major trade publications or other major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_02_B2203; source_row=18903 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the petitioner failed to submit documentation of sales or box office receipts demonstrating commercial success relative to others in the performing arts; subsequent post-filing work could not be considered.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner failed to submit documentation of sales or box office receipts demonstrating commercial success relative to others in the performing arts; subsequent post-filing work could not be considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-29_03_B2203; source_row=18912 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c