Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Beneficiary meets advanced degree professional requirements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concludes the beneficiary has only three years and six months of qualifying specialty experience as an Industrial Engineer/Quantitative Analyst, falling 18 months short of the five years required.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concludes the beneficiary has only three years and six months of qualifying specialty experience as an Industrial Engineer/Quantitative Analyst, falling 18 months short of the five years required. The beneficiary's prior experience owning and operating a stone-products import business does not constitute full-time experience in the specialty because the duties (price forecasting for precious metals, statistical analysis, etc.) were not shown to have been performed there.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-23_02_B5203; source_row=18892 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary qualifications per labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO raised this issue sua sponte on de novo review. The labor certification requires a Master's degree in Chemistry, but the record lacked official transcripts to confirm the beneficiary's foreign degree is equivalent to a U.S. Master's degree in Chemistry.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO raised this issue sua sponte on de novo review. The labor certification requires a Master's degree in Chemistry, but the record lacked official transcripts to confirm the beneficiary's foreign degree is equivalent to a U.S. Master's degree in Chemistry.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-23_01_B5203; source_row=18890 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner paid the beneficiary less than the proffered wage in both 2012 and 2013. Net income and net current assets for 2012 were insufficient to cover the gap. The 2013 tax return was not submitted; the accountant letter was not an audited statement and referenced only total assets rather than net current assets. Evidence regarding owner salary availability was contradictory and unsupported.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner paid the beneficiary less than the proffered wage in both 2012 and 2013. Net income and net current assets for 2012 were insufficient to cover the gap. The 2013 tax return was not submitted; the accountant letter was not an audited statement and referenced only total assets rather than net current assets. Evidence regarding owner salary availability was contradictory and unsupported. Totality of circumstances did not establish ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-23_01_B5203; source_row=18889 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the beneficiary
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found this favorable finding less persuasive, observing that the petitioner did not submit a certified translation of the foreign language published material.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found this favorable finding less persuasive, observing that the petitioner did not submit a certified translation of the foreign language published material.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-17_01_B2203; source_row=18884 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the salary evidence is consistent with the beneficiary being among the small percentage at the very top of the field, noting his earnings well exceed prevailing wages in his occupation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the salary evidence is consistent with the beneficiary being among the small percentage at the very top of the field, noting his earnings well exceed prevailing wages in his occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-17_01_B2203; source_row=18887 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed, citing reference letters establishing the beneficiary's leading or critical role as Creative Director and prior roles for a distinguished videogame publisher and developer.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed, citing reference letters establishing the beneficiary's leading or critical role as Creative Director and prior roles for a distinguished videogame publisher and developer.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-17_01_B2203; source_row=18886 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed, citing letters describing the beneficiary's peer reviews and creative oversight, his written critiques of videogames in development, and his service on a design judging panel.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed, citing letters describing the beneficiary's peer reviews and creative oversight, his written critiques of videogames in development, and his service on a design judging panel.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-17_01_B2203; source_row=18885 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO concluded the totality of evidence — leadership roles at distinguished companies, judging, high salary, and innovative credited work on award-winning, commercially successful videogames — establishes the beneficiary is among the small percentage at the very top of the field with sustained acclaim.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the totality of evidence — leadership roles at distinguished companies, judging, high salary, and innovative credited work on award-winning, commercially successful videogames — establishes the beneficiary is among the small percentage at the very top of the field with sustained acclaim.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-17_01_B2203; source_row=18888 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO noted that because step one was not satisfied, no final merits determination was required, but stated in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not show the petitioner has achieved the level of expertise required for the classification.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted that because step one was not satisfied, no final merits determination was required, but stated in the alternative that the aggregate evidence does not show the petitioner has achieved the level of expertise required for the classification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-15_01_B2203; source_row=18851 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c