Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
With a properly certified translation now in the record, the letter establishes that the petitioner participated as a judge of the work of art students, satisfying the plain language of the criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
With a properly certified translation now in the record, the letter establishes that the petitioner participated as a judge of the work of art students, satisfying the plain language of the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-15_06_B2203; source_row=18879 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Finance100 citations
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO noted petitioner misattributed a quote to AAO that came from the director's decision and was taken out of context. AAO found petitioner did not establish reliability of his exam-question-drafting claims or show how Google search results indicated impact in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted petitioner misattributed a quote to AAO that came from the director's decision and was taken out of context. AAO found petitioner did not establish reliability of his exam-question-drafting claims or show how Google search results indicated impact in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-15_02_B2203; source_row=18858 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held that hosting/anchoring a television program is equivalent to announcing, and the job-offer letter from the network CEO is the type of evidence the regulation contemplates.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that hosting/anchoring a television program is equivalent to announcing, and the job-offer letter from the network CEO is the type of evidence the regulation contemplates.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-15_05_B2203; source_row=18877 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why the evidence was persuasive
The evidence shows that the petitioner's artwork has been displayed at multiple named artistic exhibitions and showcases, satisfying the plain language of the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The evidence shows that the petitioner's artwork has been displayed at multiple named artistic exhibitions and showcases, satisfying the plain language of the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-15_04_B2203; source_row=18869 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Job offer demonstrates requirement for advanced degree professional
Why AAO was not persuaded
The plain language of Section H.14 exceeded Kellogg language by allowing acceptance of less than the minimum requirements for the advanced degree professional category, including concurrent combinations of education, training, or experience. The petitioner's argument that it was required by DOL to include such language was unpersuasive given BALCA case law weakening that requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The plain language of Section H.14 exceeded Kellogg language by allowing acceptance of less than the minimum requirements for the advanced degree professional category, including concurrent combinations of education, training, or experience. The petitioner's argument that it was required by DOL to include such language was unpersuasive given BALCA case law weakening that requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-10_01_B5203; source_row=18840 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest to a substantially greater degree than a U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's credentials demonstrate exceptional ability at most, but exceptional ability is not sufficient to establish eligibility for the waiver by statute. Awards were largely from local employers or schools, and the AP syllabus approval showed local curriculum development guided by a national body's guidelines rather than individual national influence.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's credentials demonstrate exceptional ability at most, but exceptional ability is not sufficient to establish eligibility for the waiver by statute. Awards were largely from local employers or schools, and the AP syllabus approval showed local curriculum development guided by a national body's guidelines rather than individual national influence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-08_02_B5203; source_row=18836 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serves national interest to substantially greater degree than U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found that prior counsel did not explain how the NCLBA's 'highly qualified teacher' requirements are incompatible with the existing labor certification process, and that competency as a teacher and local-level impact are insufficient to qualify for the national interest waiver.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found that prior counsel did not explain how the NCLBA's 'highly qualified teacher' requirements are incompatible with the existing labor certification process, and that competency as a teacher and local-level impact are insufficient to qualify for the national interest waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-08_03_B5203; source_row=18839 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c