Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
member of the professions holding an advanced degree
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO withdrew the director's qualification finding, holding the petitioner showed an advanced degree in mechanical engineering but did not show his trading-company general director position requires a baccalaureate or that the degree is academically appropriate to the occupation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's qualification finding, holding the petitioner showed an advanced degree in mechanical engineering but did not show his trading-company general director position requires a baccalaureate or that the degree is academically appropriate to the occupation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-08_01_B5203; source_row=18833 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherEngineer
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the petitioner failed the third prong: the support letters were general and selected by the petitioner, financial documents showed business activity but not field-wide influence, and the Turkey project plus embassy correspondence post-dated the filing and were speculative.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the petitioner failed the third prong: the support letters were general and selected by the petitioner, financial documents showed business activity but not field-wide influence, and the Turkey project plus embassy correspondence post-dated the filing and were speculative.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-08_01_B5203; source_row=18832 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the petitioner's activities were inherently local in impact. Organizational memberships did not demonstrate individual national-level contributions; claimed website influence lacked supporting documentary evidence; participation in focus groups and pilot programs was a local initiative without demonstrated national effect; and student testimonials spoke to personal classroom impact rather than influence on th…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner's activities were inherently local in impact. Organizational memberships did not demonstrate individual national-level contributions; claimed website influence lacked supporting documentary evidence; participation in focus groups and pilot programs was a local initiative without demonstrated national effect; and student testimonials spoke to personal classroom impact rather than influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-08_02_B5203; source_row=18835 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's evidence showed only local-level impact at her school; she failed to show that her work affected test scores outside her school or that other schools adopted her methods. Claims about Maryland's national ranking were unsupported, and the shortage-of-teachers argument is addressed through labor certification, not the waiver.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's evidence showed only local-level impact at her school; she failed to show that her work affected test scores outside her school or that other schools adopted her methods. Claims about Maryland's national ranking were unsupported, and the shortage-of-teachers argument is addressed through labor certification, not the waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-08_03_B5203; source_row=18838 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO did not explicitly decide this prong but implicitly found it not dispositive, noting that intrinsic merit of a profession does not itself establish entitlement to the waiver, and that the petitioner's STEM argument was inapplicable since she is a reading teacher.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
The AAO did not explicitly decide this prong but implicitly found it not dispositive, noting that intrinsic merit of a profession does not itself establish entitlement to the waiver, and that the petitioner's STEM argument was inapplicable since she is a reading teacher.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-08_03_B5203; source_row=18837 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Petitioner's salary exceeded only the minimum board-certified salary and the average/median BLS wage; he did not show his salary compared to top earners (75th or 90th percentile) and his own employer pays Senior Psychiatrists more than petitioner earns.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner's salary exceeded only the minimum board-certified salary and the average/median BLS wage; he did not show his salary compared to top earners (75th or 90th percentile) and his own employer pays Senior Psychiatrists more than petitioner earns.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-05_01_B2203; source_row=18812 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner was only a General Member at filing (Distinguished Fellow status would not take effect until May 2014), and in any event the Distinguished Fellow criteria emphasize 'significant contributions' and dedication, not 'outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.'
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner was only a General Member at filing (Distinguished Fellow status would not take effect until May 2014), and in any event the Distinguished Fellow criteria emphasize 'significant contributions' and dedication, not 'outstanding achievements as judged by recognized national or international experts.'
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-05_01_B2203; source_row=18809 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's citation record was limited (five independent cites to one article at time of filing, with only self-cites for another), expert letters were conclusory and speculative about future impact, awards were limited to intramural trainee programs, and no documentary evidence showed her methods had been widely implemented or substantially influenced the field.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's citation record was limited (five independent cites to one article at time of filing, with only self-cites for another), expert letters were conclusory and speculative about future impact, awards were limited to intramural trainee programs, and no documentary evidence showed her methods had been widely implemented or substantially influenced the field. AAO concluded the petitioner had not demonstrated original contributions of major significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-05_02_B2203; source_row=18818 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c