Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19381–19390
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot established
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker with minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner established no past track record of influential research to justify conclusions about future work. Holding an advanced degree and being a doctoral student are not sufficient bases for the national interest waiver. The petitioner must clearly present a significant benefit to the field of endeavor with a past history of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner established no past track record of influential research to justify conclusions about future work. Holding an advanced degree and being a doctoral student are not sufficient bases for the national interest waiver. The petitioner must clearly present a significant benefit to the field of endeavor with a past history of demonstrable achievement with some degree of influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-05_01_B5203; source_row=18815 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical15 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The researchgate.net data was unreliable and aggregate; reference letters were conclusory and lacked specific examples of impact; the xPharm articles were not shown to be original or to have impacted the field beyond adding to the general pool of knowledge.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The researchgate.net data was unreliable and aggregate; reference letters were conclusory and lacked specific examples of impact; the xPharm articles were not shown to be original or to have impacted the field beyond adding to the general pool of knowledge.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-05_01_B2203; source_row=18810 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate evidence does not show the required level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not conduct a formal final merits determination because the petitioner failed step 1, but noted in dicta that the aggregate evidence does not show the required level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-05_02_B2203; source_row=18820 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical3 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found petitioner did not show the number of students taught is significant nationally, nor that her work resulted in nationally significant savings. Reputation of employers and asserted physician shortage are not grounds for finding national scope under NYSDOT.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found petitioner did not show the number of students taught is significant nationally, nor that her work resulted in nationally significant savings. Reputation of employers and asserted physician shortage are not grounds for finding national scope under NYSDOT.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-05_04_B5203; source_row=18828 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical3 papers
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed that the letters were generic, lacked corroboration, and that petitioner failed to demonstrate impact or influence on the field. Peer review participation, listings on web sites, and unspecified procedures did not show distinction above colleagues. Future-oriented predictions in expert letters do not establish past achievement.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the letters were generic, lacked corroboration, and that petitioner failed to demonstrate impact or influence on the field. Peer review participation, listings on web sites, and unspecified procedures did not show distinction above colleagues. Future-oriented predictions in expert letters do not establish past achievement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-12-05_04_B5203; source_row=18829 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c