Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19431–19440
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO acknowledged throughout the proceeding that the petitioner's graduate-era research had impact and influence in thermoelectric materials.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged throughout the proceeding that the petitioner's graduate-era research had impact and influence in thermoelectric materials.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-28_03_B5203; source_row=18789 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO concluded the new evidence did not establish that the petitioner's post-graduate employment generated work of significant national impact. The papers cited as 'new research' actually re-analyzed graduate-era data; the former employer's impact was limited (SEC fraud allegation, fewer than ten machines sold); customer relationships and patents not naming the petitioner did not show his individual influence on the field as…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO concluded the new evidence did not establish that the petitioner's post-graduate employment generated work of significant national impact. The papers cited as 'new research' actually re-analyzed graduate-era data; the former employer's impact was limited (SEC fraud allegation, fewer than ten machines sold); customer relationships and patents not naming the petitioner did not show his individual influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-28_03_B5203; source_row=18791 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's self-described specialty is marketing and sales, and while his work may have benefited his employers, he has not shown he played a significant role in advancing the broader interactive display industry. Claims of confidentiality do not relieve the petitioner of his burden of proof, and the unsigned letters lacked documentary corroboration.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's self-described specialty is marketing and sales, and while his work may have benefited his employers, he has not shown he played a significant role in advancing the broader interactive display industry. Claims of confidentiality do not relieve the petitioner of his burden of proof, and the unsigned letters lacked documentary corroboration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-28_02_B5203; source_row=18783 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to submit corroborating documentary evidence showing that his developed methodology was widely adopted by companies across the United States; company-level statistics did not establish the petitioner's individual role in that adoption.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to submit corroborating documentary evidence showing that his developed methodology was widely adopted by companies across the United States; company-level statistics did not establish the petitioner's individual role in that adoption.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-28_02_B5203; source_row=18782 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c