Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's classroom teaching is inherently local in scope per NYSDOT. His educational website lacked evidence of actual national-scope content or traffic, his books published in the Philippines were not shown to have relevance to U.S. special education, his U.S.…
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's classroom teaching is inherently local in scope per NYSDOT. His educational website lacked evidence of actual national-scope content or traffic, his books published in the Philippines were not shown to have relevance to U.S. special education, his U.S. publications were poetry and religious music unrelated to special education, and his proposed foundation did not yet exist and could not retroactively qualify him. General assertions about nationwide educational benefit were unsupported by evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-18_04_B5203; source_row=18746 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / ClinicalPhD
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed the petitioner failed to demonstrate a past record of achievement with sufficient influence on the field as a whole. His role was primarily as a research assistant conducting literature reviews, the single citation from Polish researchers was insufficient, the proposed lifestyle program was entirely speculative, and the claimed $218 billion savings figure appeared to pertain to all chronic illness rather than med…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the petitioner failed to demonstrate a past record of achievement with sufficient influence on the field as a whole. His role was primarily as a research assistant conducting literature reviews, the single citation from Polish researchers was insufficient, the proposed lifestyle program was entirely speculative, and the claimed $218 billion savings figure appeared to pertain to all chronic illness rather than medulloblastoma specifically.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-18_06_B5203; source_row=18750 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found that because the petitioner was still a doctoral student at filing and had not provided details about intended employment, it could not be determined whether a doctorate was required. Without that showing, the petitioner failed to establish eligibility as of the filing date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that because the petitioner was still a doctoral student at filing and had not provided details about intended employment, it could not be determined whether a doctorate was required. Without that showing, the petitioner failed to establish eligibility as of the filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-18_06_B5203; source_row=18751 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner merely referred to previously submitted materials without contesting the director's specific findings; a passing reference without substantive argument is insufficient to raise an issue on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner merely referred to previously submitted materials without contesting the director's specific findings; a passing reference without substantive argument is insufficient to raise an issue on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-18_02_B2203; source_row=18733 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the petitioner participated in the selection of national team members, satisfying the plain language requirements of the judging criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record contained sufficient documentary evidence that the petitioner participated in the selection of national team members, satisfying the plain language requirements of the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-11-18_02_B2203; source_row=18734 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c