Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
recognition for achievements and significant contributions to the industry
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that aligning with industry best practices and being vital to a single company project does not establish significant contributions to the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that aligning with industry best practices and being vital to a single company project does not establish significant contributions to the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-10_02_B5203; source_row=42274 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
Professional experience and success as a coach do not satisfy the original contribution element. The recommendation letters were mostly from parents offering general praise, and two letters from former students did not establish that the coaching method was an original contribution of major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
Professional experience and success as a coach do not satisfy the original contribution element. The recommendation letters were mostly from parents offering general praise, and two letters from former students did not establish that the coaching method was an original contribution of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_03_B2203; source_row=42257 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record lacked adequate primary evidence of KGF membership and did not show outstanding achievements was a prerequisite. USA Gymnastics membership required only safety training and background checks, not outstanding achievements. No evidence established FIG or USAJ membership requirements or that outstanding achievements was a prerequisite for any of these organizations.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record lacked adequate primary evidence of KGF membership and did not show outstanding achievements was a prerequisite. USA Gymnastics membership required only safety training and background checks, not outstanding achievements. No evidence established FIG or USAJ membership requirements or that outstanding achievements was a prerequisite for any of these organizations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_03_B2203; source_row=42254 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the petitioner in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The submitted articles either did not mention the petitioner, lacked required author information, were not about the petitioner, or were published after the petition's July 2023 filing date and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The submitted articles either did not mention the petitioner, lacked required author information, were not about the petitioner, or were published after the petition's July 2023 filing date and thus could not establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_03_B2203; source_row=42255 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner relied on the importance of the industry rather than the specific endeavor, and his business plan offered generalized projections without evidentiary ties to substantial positive economic effects, U.S. job creation, or impact on an economically depressed area.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found substantial merit but not national importance. The Petitioner relied on the importance of the industry rather than the specific endeavor, and his business plan offered generalized projections without evidentiary ties to substantial positive economic effects, U.S. job creation, or impact on an economically depressed area.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_03_B5203; source_row=42260 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination — sustained national or international acclaim at the top of the field
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found the Director's reasoning flawed because it expected rival companies to use patented technology, which is contrary to how patent rights work. AAO found that the commercialization through market share, the company's global standing, the $2 billion acquisition valuation, and objective third-party media coverage naming the Petitioner as the key developer together establish sustained national or international acclaim a…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the Director's reasoning flawed because it expected rival companies to use patented technology, which is contrary to how patent rights work. AAO found that the commercialization through market share, the company's global standing, the $2 billion acquisition valuation, and objective third-party media coverage naming the Petitioner as the key developer together establish sustained national or international acclaim at the top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_02_B2203; source_row=42250 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c