Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 1951–1960
NIWNIW · National importanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial merit and national importance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that generalized information about business and IT does not address the Petitioner's specific endeavor or its prospective broader impact. Government cybersecurity strategies and STEM field importance do not substitute for showing that this particular startup IT consulting company's endeavor has national or global implications.…
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that generalized information about business and IT does not address the Petitioner's specific endeavor or its prospective broader impact. Government cybersecurity strategies and STEM field importance do not substitute for showing that this particular startup IT consulting company's endeavor has national or global implications. The business plan's conflict with Form I-140 wage figures further diminished the reliability of all submitted evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_02_B5203; source_row=42251 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO found the record contained sufficient evidence of the petitioner's participation as a judge, including listing in the Tokyo Olympics Competition Officials page and a photo ID from the 2014 Asian Championships, and withdrew the director's adverse determination.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the record contained sufficient evidence of the petitioner's participation as a judge, including listing in the Tokyo Olympics Competition Officials page and a photo ID from the 2014 Asian Championships, and withdrew the director's adverse determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_03_B2203; source_row=42256 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role in a distinguished organization
What the decision said
AAO reserved this issue because even if the petitioner satisfied criterion viii, he would still fall short of meeting three out of ten criteria, making the determination unnecessary to the outcome.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reserved this issue because even if the petitioner satisfied criterion viii, he would still fall short of meeting three out of ten criteria, making the determination unnecessary to the outcome.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_03_B2203; source_row=42258 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
intent to continue working in the field in the United States
Why the evidence was persuasive
While the post-filing-date letters from the colleague and magazine were insufficient to establish intent at time of filing, the Petitioner's initial statement adequately detailed his U.S. work plans as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(5), including plans to work at a university or institution, continue researching Kyrgyz-Navajo cultural commonalities, and undertake a translation project.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
While the post-filing-date letters from the colleague and magazine were insufficient to establish intent at time of filing, the Petitioner's initial statement adequately detailed his U.S. work plans as required by 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(5), including plans to work at a university or institution, continue researching Kyrgyz-Navajo cultural commonalities, and undertake a translation project.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_01_B2203; source_row=42244 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
OtherBachelor’s
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination – sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that citation comparison evidence was untimely submitted on appeal and, even if considered, would not establish the claimed achievement; the translation selection lacked evidence of the selection criteria or the recognition it conferred; the certificate of gratitude was shared by all five translators whose field-top status was not established; and the newspaper interview reflected recognition but not top-of-field…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that citation comparison evidence was untimely submitted on appeal and, even if considered, would not establish the claimed achievement; the translation selection lacked evidence of the selection criteria or the recognition it conferred; the certificate of gratitude was shared by all five translators whose field-top status was not established; and the newspaper interview reflected recognition but not top-of-field status. Expert letters were too general and lacked sufficient explanation of research significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-09_01_B2203; source_row=42243 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO agreed with the Director that the endeavor lacks national importance. The business plan's projections of six jobs and ~$72,466 net profit were insufficiently supported, and the focus on Petitioner's qualifications/industry was misplaced for prong one.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the Director that the endeavor lacks national importance. The business plan's projections of six jobs and ~$72,466 net profit were insufficiently supported, and the focus on Petitioner's qualifications/industry was misplaced for prong one.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-06_01_B5203; source_row=42226 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO agreed the Petitioner's degree is a bachelor's/undergraduate degree, not a doctorate, and that dentistry customarily requires a doctoral degree, so a combination of education and experience cannot satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed the Petitioner's degree is a bachelor's/undergraduate degree, not a doctorate, and that dentistry customarily requires a doctoral degree, so a combination of education and experience cannot satisfy 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2024-12-06_04_B5203; source_row=42235 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c