Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 19671–19680

EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Petitioner failed to submit reliable evidence of membership; the membership certificate misspelled 'Theatre,' she failed to submit the original despite request, supporting letters were inconsistent, and the regulation requires membership in associations (plural).

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Petitioner failed to submit reliable evidence of membership; the membership certificate misspelled 'Theatre,' she failed to submit the original despite request, supporting letters were inconsistent, and the regulation requires membership in associations (plural).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_02_B2203; source_row=18499
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

Articles lacked URLs, lacked certified translations, lacked circulation evidence; some materials were not about the petitioner; some were published after the filing date.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Articles lacked URLs, lacked certified translations, lacked circulation evidence; some materials were not about the petitioner; some were published after the filing date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_02_B2203; source_row=18500
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Final merits

sustained national or international acclaim / very top of field

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed: the awards were limited to younger contestants, lacked national recognition documentation, and the aggregate evidence did not show the petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of her field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed: the awards were limited to younger contestants, lacked national recognition documentation, and the aggregate evidence did not show the petitioner is among the small percentage at the very top of her field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_02_B2203; source_row=18506
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

Why AAO was not persuaded

The 'invited art director' appointment certificate did not specify duties, no organizational chart was provided, and there was no documentary evidence of a distinguished reputation for the institute.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The 'invited art director' appointment certificate did not specify duties, no organizational chart was provided, and there was no documentary evidence of a distinguished reputation for the institute.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_02_B2203; source_row=18505
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The local association award reflected only local recognition; nominations are not prizes or awards; finalist status is not a prize or award; and the one winner certificate lacked evidence of national or international recognition.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The local association award reflected only local recognition; nominations are not prizes or awards; finalist status is not a prize or award; and the one winner certificate lacked evidence of national or international recognition.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=18485
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

No documentary evidence showed that directing eight companies rises to major significance; academic achievements are not equivalent to contributions of major significance; no evidence showed the petitioner's published papers were frequently cited or otherwise had major impact on the field.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
No documentary evidence showed that directing eight companies rises to major significance; academic achievements are not equivalent to contributions of major significance; no evidence showed the petitioner's published papers were frequently cited or otherwise had major impact on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=18489
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Commercial successNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Commercial success

commercial successes in the performing arts

Why AAO was not persuaded

Although the petitioner mentioned performing arts activities, she submitted no box office receipts or record/video sales demonstrating commercial successes in the performing arts.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although the petitioner mentioned performing arts activities, she submitted no box office receipts or record/video sales demonstrating commercial successes in the performing arts.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=18493
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Leading / critical role

leading or critical role for distinguished organizations

Why AAO was not persuaded

No documentary evidence showed that any of the petitioner's eight companies has a distinguished reputation; her service was with a local chapter rather than a national board; her membership role was not shown to be leading or critical; and no documentary evidence showed the associations have distinguished reputations.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
No documentary evidence showed that any of the petitioner's eight companies has a distinguished reputation; her service was with a local chapter rather than a national board; her membership role was not shown to be leading or critical; and no documentary evidence showed the associations have distinguished reputations.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=18491
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien in major media

Why AAO was not persuaded

Most submissions lacked evidence of major media status, were advertisements rather than independent journalistic reportage, were authored by (not about) the petitioner, were about other subjects, or lacked required title/date/author information. Authored books do not constitute published material about the alien.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Most submissions lacked evidence of major media status, were advertisements rather than independent journalistic reportage, were authored by (not about) the petitioner, were about other subjects, or lacked required title/date/author information. Authored books do not constitute published material about the alien.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=18487
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

Compliance with a professional ethics code does not equate to outstanding achievements; no documentary evidence showed membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts; the supporting letter's claims about the designation were unsubstantiated.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Compliance with a professional ethics code does not equate to outstanding achievements; no documentary evidence showed membership required outstanding achievements judged by recognized experts; the supporting letter's claims about the designation were unsubstantiated.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-26_01_B2203; source_row=18486
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment