Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19741–19750
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Chemistry / Chemical Engineering2,011 papers
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO found the petitioner's citations were minimal to moderate and insufficient to show major significance, journal prestige metrics did not establish article-level impact, reference letters largely spoke to potential future impact rather than existing major contributions, a patent application without evidence of field-wide impact was insufficient, and conference presentations without evidence of influence did not suffice.…
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found the petitioner's citations were minimal to moderate and insufficient to show major significance, journal prestige metrics did not establish article-level impact, reference letters largely spoke to potential future impact rather than existing major contributions, a patent application without evidence of field-wide impact was insufficient, and conference presentations without evidence of influence did not suffice. Post-filing citation updates were also disregarded as the petitioner must establish eligibility at the time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-08_01_B2203; source_row=18411 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations
Why AAO was not persuaded
Even assuming the petitioner performed a leading or critical role for the one remaining organization, he failed to provide independent, objective evidence of that organization's distinguished reputation. Moreover, the plain language of the regulation requires performance in a leading or critical role for 'organizations or establishments' in the plural, and the petitioner only identified one organization on appeal.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Even assuming the petitioner performed a leading or critical role for the one remaining organization, he failed to provide independent, objective evidence of that organization's distinguished reputation. Moreover, the plain language of the regulation requires performance in a leading or critical role for 'organizations or establishments' in the plural, and the petitioner only identified one organization on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-08_04_B2203; source_row=18430 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reversed the director's finding on de novo review. The petitioner's personal statements were unsupported by documentary evidence. The foreign language articles lacked compliant certified translations. Letters and emails from colleagues described the petitioner's managerial or design roles but did not establish he actually performed formal judging duties over the work of others in his or an allied field.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the director's finding on de novo review. The petitioner's personal statements were unsupported by documentary evidence. The foreign language articles lacked compliant certified translations. Letters and emails from colleagues described the petitioner's managerial or design roles but did not establish he actually performed formal judging duties over the work of others in his or an allied field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-08_04_B2203; source_row=18426 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
AAO declined to reach a full final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the threshold three-criteria requirement, though it briefly noted the evidence did not reflect the requisite level of expertise.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO declined to reach a full final merits determination because the petitioner failed to meet the threshold three-criteria requirement, though it briefly noted the evidence did not reflect the requisite level of expertise.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-08_02_B2203; source_row=18419 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record contains sufficient documentary evidence, including a co-authored article published in a named journal, establishing the petitioner meets the plain language of this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.
View full reasoning +
The record contains sufficient documentary evidence, including a co-authored article published in a named journal, establishing the petitioner meets the plain language of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-08_03_B2203; source_row=18423 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record contains sufficient documentary evidence, including reviewing articles for two publications, establishing the petitioner meets the plain language of this criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record contains sufficient documentary evidence, including reviewing articles for two publications, establishing the petitioner meets the plain language of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-08_03_B2203; source_row=18422 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The record includes evidence of the petitioner serving as a reviewer of manuscripts submitted to professional publications, satisfying the judging criterion.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The record includes evidence of the petitioner serving as a reviewer of manuscripts submitted to professional publications, satisfying the judging criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-09-08_01_B2203; source_row=18410 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c