Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19771–19780
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance in the field
Why AAO was not persuaded
The reference letters were vague, generalized, and failed to provide specific examples of how the petitioner's work influenced the field as a whole. Much of the evidence either post-dated the filing or was speculative about future impact. The petitioner did not show that his work rose to the level of original contributions of major significance in the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The reference letters were vague, generalized, and failed to provide specific examples of how the petitioner's work influenced the field as a whole. Much of the evidence either post-dated the filing or was speculative about future impact. The petitioner did not show that his work rose to the level of original contributions of major significance in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_02_B2203; source_row=18375 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's field is not in the performing arts, so the criterion does not apply on its face. The comparable-evidence provision at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4) does not apply because other regulatory criteria do readily apply to the petitioner's occupation.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's field is not in the performing arts, so the criterion does not apply on its face. The comparable-evidence provision at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(h)(4) does not apply because other regulatory criteria do readily apply to the petitioner's occupation. Even if comparable evidence were permissible, letters of support attesting to the petitioner's work are not comparable to objective evidence of box office receipts or record/video sales, and no specific sales figures were provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_02_B2203; source_row=18377 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
The certificates show participation rather than nationally or internationally recognized prizes. Awards won by the petitioner's coached athletes do not constitute the petitioner's own receipt of prizes under the plain language of the regulation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The certificates show participation rather than nationally or internationally recognized prizes. Awards won by the petitioner's coached athletes do not constitute the petitioner's own receipt of prizes under the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_01_B2203; source_row=18364 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The plain language of the regulation specifically requires evidence of membership in associations which require outstanding achievements of their members. No bylaws, constitution, or membership regulations were submitted to demonstrate this requirement.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The plain language of the regulation specifically requires evidence of membership in associations which require outstanding achievements of their members. No bylaws, constitution, or membership regulations were submitted to demonstrate this requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_01_B2203; source_row=18365 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO withdrew the director's finding on de novo review. The certificate did not specify whether the petitioner acted as a judge or merely a referee, and there was no evidence that being a referee equates to judging competitors' work. The support letter asserting panel judging lacked specificity and corroboration.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding on de novo review. The certificate did not specify whether the petitioner acted as a judge or merely a referee, and there was no evidence that being a referee equates to judging competitors' work. The support letter asserting panel judging lacked specificity and corroboration.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_01_B2203; source_row=18367 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO accepted that petitioner played a critical role for the collegiate chess team but found the criterion's plural requirement was not met because petitioner showed such a role only for a single organization.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO accepted that petitioner played a critical role for the collegiate chess team but found the criterion's plural requirement was not met because petitioner showed such a role only for a single organization.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_03_B2203; source_row=18382 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the title-award process amounts to confirmation of competitive results rather than judging by experts; the petitioner did not show the title constitutes association membership; and in any event the criterion requires membership in multiple qualifying associations, which was not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the title-award process amounts to confirmation of competitive results rather than judging by experts; the petitioner did not show the title constitutes association membership; and in any event the criterion requires membership in multiple qualifying associations, which was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_03_B2203; source_row=18380 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary's qualifying experience per ETA Form 9089
What the decision said
AAO did not resolve the qualifications question but identified additional unresolved aspects (whether the prior employer was actually in control of the beneficiary's employment given attenuated contracting) and remanded for the director to determine whether the beneficiary had the required qualifications on the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO did not resolve the qualifications question but identified additional unresolved aspects (whether the prior employer was actually in control of the beneficiary's employment given attenuated contracting) and remanded for the director to determine whether the beneficiary had the required qualifications on the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_01_B5203; source_row=18370 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO raised the ability-to-pay issue sua sponte given the large number of pending sponsored petitions and possible successor liabilities, and remanded for the director to evaluate.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO raised the ability-to-pay issue sua sponte given the large number of pending sponsored petitions and possible successor liabilities, and remanded for the director to evaluate.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_01_B5203; source_row=18372 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
realistic, bona fide job offer with petitioner as direct employer
What the decision said
AAO noted unresolved ownership inconsistencies and a question about whether the petitioner is the direct employer or is subcontracting, and remanded for further investigation.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO noted unresolved ownership inconsistencies and a question about whether the petitioner is the direct employer or is subcontracting, and remanded for further investigation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-26_01_B5203; source_row=18371 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c