Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The record contained no documentary evidence of box office receipts or sales. Letters were unsworn and could not substitute for primary or secondary evidence. The petitioner did not establish that primary or secondary evidence was unavailable.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contained no documentary evidence of box office receipts or sales. Letters were unsworn and could not substitute for primary or secondary evidence. The petitioner did not establish that primary or secondary evidence was unavailable.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18360 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
Petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence of his own salary or remuneration, or of earnings of others in his occupation at the top level. Letters from colleagues lacked sworn affirmation and were insufficient. The article describing him as 'very expensive' came from a publication with no verified independent journalistic standing.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence of his own salary or remuneration, or of earnings of others in his occupation at the top level. Letters from colleagues lacked sworn affirmation and were insufficient. The article describing him as 'very expensive' came from a publication with no verified independent journalistic standing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18359 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that criterion (vii) is limited to the visual arts. A music producer's work performed on stage or radio is not 'on display' in the same sense as a painter's or sculptor's work in a gallery.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that criterion (vii) is limited to the visual arts. A music producer's work performed on stage or radio is not 'on display' in the same sense as a painter's or sculptor's work in a gallery.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18357 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWprocedural or otherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
procedural or other
specific identification of erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the appellate statement merely repeated prior claims already considered, failed to address the director's findings on articles, citations, conference presentations, and clinical work, and did not explain why the unmentioned peer review activity should qualify the petitioner.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the appellate statement merely repeated prior claims already considered, failed to address the director's findings on articles, citations, conference presentations, and clinical work, and did not explain why the unmentioned peer review activity should qualify the petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B5203; source_row=18362 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence, including letters attesting to the leading and/or critical role the petitioner played in producing and arranging award-winning songs in Armenia.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence, including letters attesting to the leading and/or critical role the petitioner played in producing and arranging award-winning songs in Armenia.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18358 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence establishing that the petitioner served as a judge in 2012.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO disagreed with the director, finding that the record contained sufficient documentary evidence establishing that the petitioner served as a judge in 2012.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-25_01_B2203; source_row=18356 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary qualifications per labor certification
Why the evidence was persuasive
On de novo review, the AAO concluded the petitioner established the beneficiary more likely than not had all the required education, training, and experience as of the priority date.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
On de novo review, the AAO concluded the petitioner established the beneficiary more likely than not had all the required education, training, and experience as of the priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-20_01_B5203; source_row=18350 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner paid no wages to the beneficiary, had net income of $45,124 in 2011 and negative net income in 2012, and net current assets of approximately $546,000–$549,000 — all well short of the $1,294,508.80 combined annual obligation. The 2013 data was not provided. Future contract transfer was too speculative, and the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances factors did not support ability to pay.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner paid no wages to the beneficiary, had net income of $45,124 in 2011 and negative net income in 2012, and net current assets of approximately $546,000–$549,000 — all well short of the $1,294,508.80 combined annual obligation. The 2013 data was not provided. Future contract transfer was too speculative, and the Sonegawa totality-of-circumstances factors did not support ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-20_02_B5203; source_row=18352 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
bona fide and realistic job offer at listed worksite
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner listed a virtual office as its worksite on the labor certification, while the beneficiary would actually be located at a third-party employer's address in a different county and MSA. The petitioner failed to address this discrepancy on appeal, and a possible relocation to South Carolina made the situation worse. There was also no evidence of a genuine permanent employment relationship with the petitioner.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner listed a virtual office as its worksite on the labor certification, while the beneficiary would actually be located at a third-party employer's address in a different county and MSA. The petitioner failed to address this discrepancy on appeal, and a possible relocation to South Carolina made the situation worse. There was also no evidence of a genuine permanent employment relationship with the petitioner.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-08-20_02_B5203; source_row=18353 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c