Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 19931–19940
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
Published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner provided newspaper articles about the petitioner and his work, but failed to submit probative evidence demonstrating the publications qualified as professional or major trade publications or other major media. Some articles were about the band rather than the petitioner, and those that merely mention the petitioner's position within a group do not equate to published material about him.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner provided newspaper articles about the petitioner and his work, but failed to submit probative evidence demonstrating the publications qualified as professional or major trade publications or other major media. Some articles were about the band rather than the petitioner, and those that merely mention the petitioner's position within a group do not equate to published material about him.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-16_02_B2203; source_row=18189 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Display of the alien's work at artistic exhibitions or showcases
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner claimed jazz festival performances as qualifying, but AAO held that criterion (vii) is limited to visual arts and that a musical performance is not a 'display.' The petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner claimed jazz festival performances as qualifying, but AAO held that criterion (vii) is limited to visual arts and that a musical performance is not a 'display.' The petitioner is not a visual artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions or showcases.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-16_02_B2203; source_row=18191 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Commercial successes in the performing arts as shown by box office receipts or record/cassette/CD/video sales
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner relied on chart placement and an article indicating an album sold over 150,000 copies, but the record lacked probative evidence of the petitioner's sufficient involvement with the album to establish those sales constituted his commercial success. Chart placement was not shown to be based on sales.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner relied on chart placement and an article indicating an album sold over 150,000 copies, but the record lacked probative evidence of the petitioner's sufficient involvement with the album to establish those sales constituted his commercial success. Chart placement was not shown to be based on sales.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-16_02_B2203; source_row=18193 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards for excellence
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's award documentation lacked source information, preventing USCIS verification. There was no primary evidence of the petitioner's receipt of any award individually or as a group member.…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's award documentation lacked source information, preventing USCIS verification. There was no primary evidence of the petitioner's receipt of any award individually or as a group member. The petitioner failed to demonstrate he was a recipient of the 2008 solo award, the evidence of the 2006 group award carried very little weight due to unverifiable sources, and the regulation requires 'prizes or awards' in the plural.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-16_02_B2203; source_row=18188 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Leading or critical role for organizations or establishments with a distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's evidence of the musical groups' distinguished reputations largely lacked identifiable sources and carried diminished evidentiary weight. For the one group with documented distinguished reputation, the petitioner failed to establish he performed in a leading or critical role. For other groups, no independent evidence of distinguished reputation was provided.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's evidence of the musical groups' distinguished reputations largely lacked identifiable sources and carried diminished evidentiary weight. For the one group with documented distinguished reputation, the petitioner failed to establish he performed in a leading or critical role. For other groups, no independent evidence of distinguished reputation was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-16_02_B2203; source_row=18192 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the petitioner failed to document receipt of most claimed awards, that academic scholarships and fellowships are not awards for excellence in a field of endeavor, that research grants fund future work rather than recognize excellence, and that visiting scholar status is employment rather than an award.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner failed to document receipt of most claimed awards, that academic scholarships and fellowships are not awards for excellence in a field of endeavor, that research grants fund future work rather than recognize excellence, and that visiting scholar status is employment rather than an award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-16_01_B2203; source_row=18181 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner initially claimed awards as a one-time achievement, but after the RFE notified him they were insufficient, he did not contest that conclusion and did not assert eligibility under this provision on appeal. AAO deemed the claim abandoned.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner initially claimed awards as a one-time achievement, but after the RFE notified him they were insufficient, he did not contest that conclusion and did not assert eligibility under this provision on appeal. AAO deemed the claim abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-16_02_B2203; source_row=18187 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Social Sciences
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the signed support letters were complimentary but addressed potential future impact rather than demonstrated impact on the field as a whole; unsigned letters had no probative value; book inclusion lacked supporting evidence of the texts' impact; download counts without citations did not show impact; and conference participation is inherent to post-secondary teaching.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the signed support letters were complimentary but addressed potential future impact rather than demonstrated impact on the field as a whole; unsigned letters had no probative value; book inclusion lacked supporting evidence of the texts' impact; download counts without citations did not show impact; and conference participation is inherent to post-secondary teaching.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-16_01_B2203; source_row=18184 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c