Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
Ability to pay proffered wage as of priority date and continuing
Why AAO was not persuaded
Despite net income and net current assets that might individually suffice, the petitioner had twenty additional pending I-140 beneficiaries and failed to provide required documentation for ten of them. The petitioner's own data showed a massive wage shortfall across disclosed beneficiaries, defeating a showing of overall ability to pay.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Despite net income and net current assets that might individually suffice, the petitioner had twenty additional pending I-140 beneficiaries and failed to provide required documentation for ten of them. The petitioner's own data showed a massive wage shortfall across disclosed beneficiaries, defeating a showing of overall ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-11_01_B5203; source_row=18156 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner submitted plagiarized and/or falsified articles and citations, as well as witness letters containing false or misleading claims, to USCIS, constituting a false representation to a government official.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted plagiarized and/or falsified articles and citations, as well as witness letters containing false or misleading claims, to USCIS, constituting a false representation to a government official.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-10_01_B5203; source_row=18151 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The falsified documents related to the petitioner's past record in her field and were directly relevant to the NIW eligibility criteria, making the misrepresentation material to the proceeding.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The falsified documents related to the petitioner's past record in her field and were directly relevant to the NIW eligibility criteria, making the misrepresentation material to the proceeding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-10_01_B5203; source_row=18153 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The AAO found willfulness because the petitioner certified the petition under penalty of perjury and could not have mistakenly believed she authored the plagiarized article, which she retitled and claimed as her own. Her attempt to blame an unnamed third party lacked corroboration and credibility.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO found willfulness because the petitioner certified the petition under penalty of perjury and could not have mistakenly believed she authored the plagiarized article, which she retitled and claimed as her own. Her attempt to blame an unnamed third party lacked corroboration and credibility.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-10_01_B5203; source_row=18152 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The DOL revoked the labor certification due to an undisclosed familial relationship between the beneficiary and the employer's president. Without a valid labor certification, the petition cannot be adjudicated and the appeal is moot.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The DOL revoked the labor certification due to an undisclosed familial relationship between the beneficiary and the employer's president. Without a valid labor certification, the petition cannot be adjudicated and the appeal is moot.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-08_01_B5203; source_row=18150 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
high salary or significantly high remuneration
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner did not submit actual earnings documentation (e.g., tax forms). Several items post-dated the filing and could not establish eligibility at time of filing. No comparative data was presented showing the petitioner's remuneration was high relative to others in the field. AAO withdrew the director's finding that age of consignment records made them inadmissible, but affirmed the overall not-met determination.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not submit actual earnings documentation (e.g., tax forms). Several items post-dated the filing and could not establish eligibility at time of filing. No comparative data was presented showing the petitioner's remuneration was high relative to others in the field. AAO withdrew the director's finding that age of consignment records made them inadmissible, but affirmed the overall not-met determination.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-03_02_B2203; source_row=18145 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien in professional or major trade publications or other major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO acknowledged the petitioner did submit some articles in response to the RFE (contrary to the director's view) but found the articles were largely about exhibitions rather than about the petitioner, lacked required translations and authors, and did not establish the publications as major media.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO acknowledged the petitioner did submit some articles in response to the RFE (contrary to the director's view) but found the articles were largely about exhibitions rather than about the petitioner, lacked required translations and authors, and did not establish the publications as major media.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-03_01_B2203; source_row=18131 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the comparable-evidence regulation inapplicable, the letters vague and conclusory, and the petitioner's specific contributions not shown to have influenced the field at large.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the comparable-evidence regulation inapplicable, the letters vague and conclusory, and the petitioner's specific contributions not shown to have influenced the field at large.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-07-03_01_B2203; source_row=18133 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c