Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
The petitioner submitted a letter from a dean confirming her participation as an external reviewer of a university program review, a program review schedule documenting her participation, and an email requesting her participation. This was sufficient to meet the plain language of the regulation.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted a letter from a dean confirming her participation as an external reviewer of a university program review, a program review schedule documenting her participation, and an email requesting her participation. This was sufficient to meet the plain language of the regulation.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-20_01_B2203; source_row=18075 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the petitioner's assertion that he deserves the waiver because he wins races lacks clarity and detail. The record does not explain how the United States benefits more when the petitioner wins a race versus another runner, and the petitioner's community service work was not shown to have significant national impact.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner's assertion that he deserves the waiver because he wins races lacks clarity and detail. The record does not explain how the United States benefits more when the petitioner wins a race versus another runner, and the petitioner's community service work was not shown to have significant national impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-18_01_B5203; source_row=18068 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWEB-1A · High remunerationNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · High remuneration
salary or remuneration demonstrating exceptional ability
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner failed to show that his earnings were significantly above what is ordinarily encountered in his occupation. The circular argument that being a top runner means his earnings must reflect exceptional ability presumes the conclusion to be proven.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner failed to show that his earnings were significantly above what is ordinarily encountered in his occupation. The circular argument that being a top runner means his earnings must reflect exceptional ability presumes the conclusion to be proven.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-18_01_B5203; source_row=18062 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that while the petitioner's work is part of a larger system that collectively serves the national interest, she did not establish that her individual impact on the GIS field or on national water pollution efforts warranted a waiver.…
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that while the petitioner's work is part of a larger system that collectively serves the national interest, she did not establish that her individual impact on the GIS field or on national water pollution efforts warranted a waiver. Her record did not demonstrate prominent standing in the field as a whole, and new evidence of a consulting company and additional projects could not retroactively establish eligibility at time of filing.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-18_02_B5203; source_row=18071 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
On appeal, the petitioner submitted the letter on official letterhead, addressing the director's specific concern. AAO found the petitioner established membership in the professional association, though it declined to reach whether this membership demonstrates exceptional ability since fewer than three criteria were met overall.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
On appeal, the petitioner submitted the letter on official letterhead, addressing the director's specific concern. AAO found the petitioner established membership in the professional association, though it declined to reach whether this membership demonstrates exceptional ability since fewer than three criteria were met overall.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-18_01_B5203; source_row=18063 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWten years experienceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
ten years experience
ten years full-time experience (employer letters)
Why AAO was not persuaded
The current employer was not in a position to attest to the petitioner's employment before 2009, and no letters from prior employers were submitted. The petitioner did not demonstrate unavailability of such evidence as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(2)(i).
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The current employer was not in a position to attest to the petitioner's employment before 2009, and no letters from prior employers were submitted. The petitioner did not demonstrate unavailability of such evidence as required by 8 C.F.R. § 103.2(b)(2)(i).
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-18_01_B5203; source_row=18061 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that the 'national scope' prong revolves around traits inherent in the occupation rather than the petitioner's individual achievements, and the petitioner did not show how his involvement influenced the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the 'national scope' prong revolves around traits inherent in the occupation rather than the petitioner's individual achievements, and the petitioner did not show how his involvement influenced the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-18_01_B5203; source_row=18067 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found that the totality of evidence — forty years of international project experience, employer letters, exhibition displays, and media coverage — sufficiently demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that the totality of evidence — forty years of international project experience, employer letters, exhibition displays, and media coverage — sufficiently demonstrated sustained national or international acclaim at the very top of the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=18060 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c