Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
EB-1AEB-1A · Leading / critical roleEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Leading / critical role
leading or critical role for distinguished organizations or establishments
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found criterion (viii) met based on employer letters demonstrating the leading and critical role the petitioner performed on major projects worldwide.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found criterion (viii) met based on employer letters demonstrating the leading and critical role the petitioner performed on major projects worldwide.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=18059 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Business / Management
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material about the alien
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO found sufficient evidence meeting criterion (iii) despite acknowledging not all articles named the petitioner or included publication, date, and author.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO found sufficient evidence meeting criterion (iii) despite acknowledging not all articles named the petitioner or included publication, date, and author.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-18_01_B2203; source_row=18057 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
beneficiary possesses master's degree required by labor certification
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO independently verified with the institution that the beneficiary never attended and the documents were fabricated, affirming the director's denial.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO independently verified with the institution that the beneficiary never attended and the documents were fabricated, affirming the director's denial.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-17_02_B5203; source_row=18056 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO reversed the director's finding, concluding that the salary comparison data only showed median salaries rather than high-end salaries, the personal salary report details were not visible, total remuneration included non-salary components making comparisons with salary-only statistics meaningless, and only certified translations (not original documents) were provided, accompanied by unsupported assertions from prior coun…
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the director's finding, concluding that the salary comparison data only showed median salaries rather than high-end salaries, the personal salary report details were not visible, total remuneration included non-salary components making comparisons with salary-only statistics meaningless, and only certified translations (not original documents) were provided, accompanied by unsupported assertions from prior counsel.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=18054 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held that evidence of a leading or critical role is not presumptive evidence of judging; the petitioner must show formal designation as a judge rather than incidental evaluation of others' work in a leadership capacity.
Why this is useful
See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.
View full reasoning +
AAO held that evidence of a leading or critical role is not presumptive evidence of judging; the petitioner must show formal designation as a judge rather than incidental evaluation of others' work in a leadership capacity.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=18051 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot established
Case facts
Computer Science / AI
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found that none of the letters or other evidence established contributions of major significance in the field as a whole rather than to the petitioner's employer. The certificate lacked evidence of recognition beyond the awarding entity, and the letters were vague, solicited, and lacked specificity about field-wide impact.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
AAO found that none of the letters or other evidence established contributions of major significance in the field as a whole rather than to the petitioner's employer. The certificate lacked evidence of recognition beyond the awarding entity, and the letters were vague, solicited, and lacked specificity about field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=18052 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
AAO held the petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence establishing the certificate is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field rather than appreciation for a specific project. AAO also noted the regulation's plural 'prizes or awards' requires more than one such award.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO held the petitioner failed to submit documentary evidence establishing the certificate is nationally or internationally recognized for excellence in the field rather than appreciation for a specific project. AAO also noted the regulation's plural 'prizes or awards' requires more than one such award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-06-16_01_B2203; source_row=18050 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c