Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20161–20170

NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner taught approximately 30-35 students per year, and her classroom-level results did not demonstrate impact beyond her immediate students. The NCLBA did not create a blanket waiver for teachers, and general claims about the importance of education did not satisfy the national scope requirement.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner taught approximately 30-35 students per year, and her classroom-level results did not demonstrate impact beyond her immediate students. The NCLBA did not create a blanket waiver for teachers, and general claims about the importance of education did not satisfy the national scope requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-06_01_B5203; source_row=17927
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceNot addressedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

What the decision said

AAO did not separately analyze the first prong, focusing its analysis on national scope and the petitioner's influence on the field.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not separately analyze the first prong, focusing its analysis on national scope and the petitioner's influence on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-06_01_B5203; source_row=17926
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves national interest to substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner's length of experience and awards reflect local rather than national significance, and the record does not show that her accomplishments place her above available U.S. workers in a way that serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner's length of experience and awards reflect local rather than national significance, and the record does not show that her accomplishments place her above available U.S. workers in a way that serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-06_01_B5203; source_row=17928
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that hospital affiliation alone cannot establish individual contributions; that the scholarly articles criterion is separate from contributions of major significance; that a moderate citation count without context is insufficient; and that support letters lacked specificity, were largely from immediate colleagues, contained identical boilerplate language across multiple letters, and did not show actual field i…

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that hospital affiliation alone cannot establish individual contributions; that the scholarly articles criterion is separate from contributions of major significance; that a moderate citation count without context is insufficient; and that support letters lacked specificity, were largely from immediate colleagues, contained identical boilerplate language across multiple letters, and did not show actual field impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=17919
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

Kellogg language and minimum requirements of labor certification

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed with the director that the Part H, Item 14 language was not Kellogg language and lessened the minimum requirements, making it possible to qualify without a bachelor's degree.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the Part H, Item 14 language was not Kellogg language and lessened the minimum requirements, making it possible to qualify without a bachelor's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-05_01_B5203; source_row=17924
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Computer Science / AI

Issue evaluated

other

continuing ability to pay the proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO raised this beyond the director's decision and concluded that without evidence of wages paid, sufficient net income or net current assets, Sonegawa factors, or details on the 35 other I-140 beneficiaries, the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO raised this beyond the director's decision and concluded that without evidence of wages paid, sufficient net income or net current assets, Sonegawa factors, or details on the 35 other I-140 beneficiaries, the petitioner failed to establish ability to pay.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-05_01_B5203; source_row=17925
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that the record of proceeding contained two emails showing the petitioner completed at least one manuscript review and was asked to review revisions, which was sufficient to withdraw the director's negative finding.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the record of proceeding contained two emails showing the petitioner completed at least one manuscript review and was asked to review revisions, which was sufficient to withdraw the director's negative finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=17918
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

lesser nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

What the decision said

The petitioner did not identify any factual or legal error relating to this criterion on appeal, so the claim was deemed abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not identify any factual or legal error relating to this criterion on appeal, so the claim was deemed abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=17915
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner met this criterion, and the record supports this conclusion.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The AAO agreed with the director that the petitioner met this criterion, and the record supports this conclusion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-05-05_01_B2203; source_row=17920
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance in the field

Why AAO was not persuaded

The letters of support were largely conclusory and failed to provide specific examples of how the petitioner's original artistic works significantly influenced the field of modern art. Documentary evidence of exhibitions and media coverage did not demonstrate major significance absent specific evidence of impact on the field. Post-filing evidence was also excluded on eligibility-at-time-of-filing grounds.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The letters of support were largely conclusory and failed to provide specific examples of how the petitioner's original artistic works significantly influenced the field of modern art. Documentary evidence of exhibitions and media coverage did not demonstrate major significance absent specific evidence of impact on the field. Post-filing evidence was also excluded on eligibility-at-time-of-filing grounds.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-30_02_B2203; source_row=17912
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment