Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20191–20200

NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO found that the OEM community recognizes the significance of the beneficiary's past and present endeavors beyond the intrinsic importance of the overall field, and that the benefit of retaining his services outweighs the national interest inherent in the labor certification process.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the OEM community recognizes the significance of the beneficiary's past and present endeavors beyond the intrinsic importance of the overall field, and that the benefit of retaining his services outweighs the national interest inherent in the labor certification process.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-25_01_B5203; source_row=17893
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

The graduate school award was limited to graduates of a specific program and there was no evidence it is nationally or internationally recognized. The community service certificate was awarded for community work, not for excellence in psychology, and no documentary evidence supported the petitioner's claim that it was nationally recognized as an award for excellence in the field.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The graduate school award was limited to graduates of a specific program and there was no evidence it is nationally or internationally recognized. The community service certificate was awarded for community work, not for excellence in psychology, and no documentary evidence supported the petitioner's claim that it was nationally recognized as an award for excellence in the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-23_02_B2203; source_row=17887
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

Why AAO was not persuaded

The expert letters describe the petitioner's useful work on Antarctic instrumentation and mercury dimer spectroscopy but do not establish that her contributions rose to major significance in the field as a whole.…

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The expert letters describe the petitioner's useful work on Antarctic instrumentation and mercury dimer spectroscopy but do not establish that her contributions rose to major significance in the field as a whole. Citation counts per article were low (maximum five independent citations), and evidence of conference presentations, peer review participation, and letters of support do not substitute for documentary proof of major field-wide impact.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-23_01_B2203; source_row=17883
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Published material

published material about the alien

Why AAO was not persuaded

Articles from major publications did not mention the petitioner and were abandoned on appeal. Citation evidence does not qualify because articles citing the petitioner's work are primarily about the authors' own work, not about the petitioner.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Articles from major publications did not mention the petitioner and were abandoned on appeal. Citation evidence does not qualify because articles citing the petitioner's work are primarily about the authors' own work, not about the petitioner. Letters of support are not published material, and the comparable evidence argument fails because the petitioner did not show the standard criteria are inapplicable to physical scientists.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-23_01_B2203; source_row=17881
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

scholarly articles in professional or major trade publications

What the decision said

The petitioner did not contest the director's findings on appeal or offer additional arguments, and therefore abandoned the issue.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not contest the director's findings on appeal or offer additional arguments, and therefore abandoned the issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-23_02_B2203; source_row=17889
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Original contributions

original contributions of major significance

What the decision said

The petitioner repeated the same list of materials on appeal without addressing the director's findings or explaining why they should be considered more persuasive, thereby abandoning the issue.

Why this is useful

Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner repeated the same list of materials on appeal without addressing the director's findings or explaining why they should be considered more persuasive, thereby abandoning the issue.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-23_02_B2203; source_row=17888
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why the evidence was persuasive

The petitioner documented authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications, meeting this criterion. The AAO disagreed with the director's finding that the criterion was not met.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner documented authorship of scholarly articles in professional publications, meeting this criterion. The AAO disagreed with the director's finding that the criterion was not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-23_01_B2203; source_row=17884
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging the work of others

Why the evidence was persuasive

The petitioner submitted evidence of peer-reviewing manuscripts for two journals, which satisfies this criterion. The director's finding is affirmed.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner submitted evidence of peer-reviewing manuscripts for two journals, which satisfies this criterion. The director's finding is affirmed.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-23_01_B2203; source_row=17882
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Mathematics / Statistics

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest waiver eligibility (overall)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO noted that the petitioner's significant claims — that her work served as a model to school systems nationally and that her online postings were groundbreaking and well received — were not substantiated. At most, the petitioner showed she posted lesson plans on a website and received comments from two teachers at her school and four students over a 16-hour period.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO noted that the petitioner's significant claims — that her work served as a model to school systems nationally and that her online postings were groundbreaking and well received — were not substantiated. At most, the petitioner showed she posted lesson plans on a website and received comments from two teachers at her school and four students over a 16-hour period.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-22_01_B5203; source_row=17876
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Foreign degree equivalency (Philippine BS Physical Therapy as at least U.S. baccalaureate)

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO found that while the petitioner failed to establish the Philippine BS in Physical Therapy is the equivalent of a U.S. master's degree, EDGE confirms it is at minimum the equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate degree. Combined with the documented five-plus years of progressive experience, this satisfies the regulatory advanced degree definition and the labor certification's alternate combination requirement.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that while the petitioner failed to establish the Philippine BS in Physical Therapy is the equivalent of a U.S. master's degree, EDGE confirms it is at minimum the equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate degree. Combined with the documented five-plus years of progressive experience, this satisfies the regulatory advanced degree definition and the labor certification's alternate combination requirement.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-22_02_B5203; source_row=17877
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment