Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 20211–20220
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO found the petitioner's evidence — including patent applications, reference letters, publications, conference presentations, NIH grant participation, and awards — did not demonstrate a past history of achievement with sufficient influence on the field as a whole. The single citation to his patent was a self-cite, fellowship appointment post-dated filing, and speculative future impact statements were insufficient.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner's evidence — including patent applications, reference letters, publications, conference presentations, NIH grant participation, and awards — did not demonstrate a past history of achievement with sufficient influence on the field as a whole. The single citation to his patent was a self-cite, fellowship appointment post-dated filing, and speculative future impact statements were insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-18_02_B5203; source_row=17854 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · National importance
substantial intrinsic merit
Why the evidence was persuasive
AAO agreed that the petitioner established the intrinsic merit of research on Camelina, which has been proposed as a biofuel feedstock for developing biodiesel and jet fuel.
Why this is useful
Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that the petitioner established the intrinsic merit of research on Camelina, which has been proposed as a biofuel feedstock for developing biodiesel and jet fuel.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-18_06_B5203; source_row=17864 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Biomedical / Life Sciences
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker
Why AAO was not persuaded
At the time of filing, the petitioner had no publication history; his first article was published on the filing date; only one citation existed at the time of the RFE response; and the new citing articles submitted on appeal post-dated the RFE response. The petitioner had not demonstrated impact or influence on his field that would set him apart from peers.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
At the time of filing, the petitioner had no publication history; his first article was published on the filing date; only one citation existed at the time of the RFE response; and the new citing articles submitted on appeal post-dated the RFE response. The petitioner had not demonstrated impact or influence on his field that would set him apart from peers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-18_05_B5203; source_row=17863 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Waiver on balance
serves national interest to substantially greater degree than U.S. worker with same minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
The petitioner's unsupported assertions about her experience and the unavailability of comparable U.S. workers were not backed by evidence. Length of experience by itself does not convey influence on the field. The burden is on the petitioner to establish eligibility, not on the director to identify a comparable candidate.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's unsupported assertions about her experience and the unavailability of comparable U.S. workers were not backed by evidence. Length of experience by itself does not convey influence on the field. The burden is on the petitioner to establish eligibility, not on the director to identify a comparable candidate.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-18_07_B5203; source_row=17871 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Mathematics / Statistics
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why AAO was not persuaded
The national scope of an overall educational problem or goal does not confer national scope on the efforts of a single teacher at one elementary school. The NCLBA did not amend the Act or create a blanket waiver for teachers, and counsel identified no legislation that would do so. The petitioner's evidence showed local-level impact only.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The national scope of an overall educational problem or goal does not confer national scope on the efforts of a single teacher at one elementary school. The NCLBA did not amend the Act or create a blanket waiver for teachers, and counsel identified no legislation that would do so. The petitioner's evidence showed local-level impact only.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-18_07_B5203; source_row=17870 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c