Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20231–20240

NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Materials SciencePhD2,009 papers

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

The national scope of the petitioner's occupation is explicitly not in dispute in this proceeding.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The national scope of the petitioner's occupation is explicitly not in dispute in this proceeding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-16_01_B5203; source_row=17846
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Totality of business circumstances under Sonegawa

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO considered the totality of business circumstances but found they did not favor the petitioner: the business had only been operating for three years (versus over 11 years in Sonegawa), one year of gross sales growth did not establish a pattern, total wages paid were low relative to claimed employment, and no evidence of industry reputation or whether the beneficiary was replacing a prior employee was provided.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The AAO considered the totality of business circumstances but found they did not favor the petitioner: the business had only been operating for three years (versus over 11 years in Sonegawa), one year of gross sales growth did not establish a pattern, total wages paid were low relative to claimed employment, and no evidence of industry reputation or whether the beneficiary was replacing a prior employee was provided.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=17844
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Net current assets / personal liquefiable assets sufficient to pay proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner did not establish that the sole proprietor had personal liquefiable assets sufficient to pay the proffered wage. The petitioner's 2012 tax return used cash-basis accounting while the audited balance sheet used accrual-basis, making them incompatible for use together in the two-prong analysis. Counsel's assertion of 'no overlap in numbers' was unsupported by evidence.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not establish that the sole proprietor had personal liquefiable assets sufficient to pay the proffered wage. The petitioner's 2012 tax return used cash-basis accounting while the audited balance sheet used accrual-basis, making them incompatible for use together in the two-prong analysis. Counsel's assertion of 'no overlap in numbers' was unsupported by evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=17843
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Petitioner paid beneficiary at or above proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The petitioner did not establish that it paid the beneficiary any wages in 2012 or from the priority date forward.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The petitioner did not establish that it paid the beneficiary any wages in 2012 or from the priority date forward.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=17841
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Net income / AGI sufficient to cover personal expenses and proffered wage

Why AAO was not persuaded

The sole proprietor's 2012 AGI of $70,054 was far below what would be needed to cover both his personal household expenses of $54,000 and the proffered wage of $164,299. Counsel also erred by using Schedule C net profit rather than AGI, and by failing to account for the proffered wage in his analysis.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The sole proprietor's 2012 AGI of $70,054 was far below what would be needed to cover both his personal household expenses of $54,000 and the proffered wage of $164,299. Counsel also erred by using Schedule C net profit rather than AGI, and by failing to account for the proffered wage in his analysis.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-15_01_B5203; source_row=17842
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherBachelor’s

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree or equivalent (baccalaureate plus five years progressive experience)

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the degree was completed in January 2005 based on transcript evidence showing the beneficiary failed multiple semesters and only became eligible for the degree after clearing the semester VI examination in January 2005. Even if inconsistencies in experience letters were resolved, the post-baccalaureate experience period from January 2005 to May 9, 2009 was less than five years.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the degree was completed in January 2005 based on transcript evidence showing the beneficiary failed multiple semesters and only became eligible for the degree after clearing the semester VI examination in January 2005. Even if inconsistencies in experience letters were resolved, the post-baccalaureate experience period from January 2005 to May 9, 2009 was less than five years. Additionally, experience letters were inconsistent and did not meet regulatory requirements, and the petitioner's own employment of the beneficiary could not be used to qualify under the labor certification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-10_01_B5203; source_row=17840
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Beneficiary holds advanced degree or equivalent

Why AAO was not persuaded

The beneficiary's Philippine bachelor's degree in physical therapy constitutes a foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate degree, not an advanced degree. EDGE states that the five-year physical therapy bachelor's degree in the Philippines is undergraduate-level, and the fact that the U.S. discontinued baccalaureate programs does not elevate the Philippine degree to master's equivalency.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's Philippine bachelor's degree in physical therapy constitutes a foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate degree, not an advanced degree. EDGE states that the five-year physical therapy bachelor's degree in the Philippines is undergraduate-level, and the fact that the U.S. discontinued baccalaureate programs does not elevate the Philippine degree to master's equivalency. The FCCPT evaluation was given reduced weight because its authority is limited to the credentialing/admissibility context, not advanced degree determinations for EB-2 purposes.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_10_B5203; source_row=17835
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

foreign equivalent degree above a baccalaureate

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the bachelor's is not a foreign equivalent advanced degree; FCCPT's substantial-equivalence coursework analysis is not binding and addresses a different standard, and EDGE confirms the Philippine PT bachelor's is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the bachelor's is not a foreign equivalent advanced degree; FCCPT's substantial-equivalence coursework analysis is not binding and addresses a different standard, and EDGE confirms the Philippine PT bachelor's is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_05_B5203; source_row=17825
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

foreign equivalent of advanced degree

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO finds the evidence insufficient to show the Philippine bachelor's degree is above baccalaureate level. EDGE indicates the Philippine PT degree is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's; CAPTE data shows U.S. master's PT programs require ~202 credits, far more than the beneficiary's program. Expert evaluations are advisory and were given less weight where inconsistent with EDGE.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO finds the evidence insufficient to show the Philippine bachelor's degree is above baccalaureate level. EDGE indicates the Philippine PT degree is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's; CAPTE data shows U.S. master's PT programs require ~202 credits, far more than the beneficiary's program. Expert evaluations are advisory and were given less weight where inconsistent with EDGE.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_07_B5203; source_row=17830
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

advanced degree or foreign equivalent under 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2)

Why AAO was not persuaded

FCCPT's substantial-equivalence finding aggregated coursework from multiple sources and is not equivalent to a single foreign degree above a baccalaureate. EDGE indicates the Philippine bachelor's in physical therapy is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a master's.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
FCCPT's substantial-equivalence finding aggregated coursework from multiple sources and is not equivalent to a single foreign degree above a baccalaureate. EDGE indicates the Philippine bachelor's in physical therapy is comparable to a U.S. bachelor's degree, not a master's.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_06_B5203; source_row=17828
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment