Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 20241–20250
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · EB-2 baseline
foreign equivalent of a U.S. advanced degree
Why AAO was not persuaded
AAO agreed with the director that the FCCPT 'substantial equivalence' evaluation, which aggregates coursework beyond the single degree, does not establish that the beneficiary's degree itself is a foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's; EDGE confirms the Philippine PT bachelor's is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that the FCCPT 'substantial equivalence' evaluation, which aggregates coursework beyond the single degree, does not establish that the beneficiary's degree itself is a foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's; EDGE confirms the Philippine PT bachelor's is equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_04_B5203; source_row=17822 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary meets minimum requirements of offered position per ETA Form 9089
Why AAO was not persuaded
Because the beneficiary's Philippine bachelor's degree is the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate and not a master's degree, and because the petitioner did not claim the alternate five years of post-baccalaureate experience, the beneficiary does not meet the stated minimum requirements of the position on the ETA Form 9089.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Because the beneficiary's Philippine bachelor's degree is the foreign equivalent of a U.S. baccalaureate and not a master's degree, and because the petitioner did not claim the alternate five years of post-baccalaureate experience, the beneficiary does not meet the stated minimum requirements of the position on the ETA Form 9089.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_10_B5203; source_row=17836 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's 2012 net income (IRS Form 1120, Line 28) was -$5,437, which is insufficient to pay the $78,582 proffered wage. USCIS properly relies on net income rather than gross receipts or gross profits, and the event production costs represent business expenses not available to pay wages.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's 2012 net income (IRS Form 1120, Line 28) was -$5,437, which is insufficient to pay the $78,582 proffered wage. USCIS properly relies on net income rather than gross receipts or gross profits, and the event production costs represent business expenses not available to pay wages.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_02_B5203; source_row=17818 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Beneficiary possessed required qualifications as of priority date
Why AAO was not persuaded
The AAO raised this ground independently. The beneficiary was not listed as a licensee on the California Architects Board website, and state law requires licensure to practice architecture. Without evidence of a license, the beneficiary has not been shown to be qualified for the proffered position.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO raised this ground independently. The beneficiary was not listed as a licensee on the California Architects Board website, and state law requires licensure to practice architecture. Without evidence of a license, the beneficiary has not been shown to be qualified for the proffered position.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_02_B5203; source_row=17821 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Net current assets sufficient to cover proffered wage
Why AAO was not persuaded
Net current assets of $15,000 were insufficient. Even adding the claimed $46,745 in outside services, the combined total of $61,745 falls short of the $78,582 proffered wage. The record also did not establish that outside services funds would have been available to pay the beneficiary.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Net current assets of $15,000 were insufficient. Even adding the claimed $46,745 in outside services, the combined total of $61,745 falls short of the $78,582 proffered wage. The record also did not establish that outside services funds would have been available to pay the beneficiary.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_02_B5203; source_row=17819 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Wages paid to beneficiary equal to or exceeding proffered wage
Why AAO was not persuaded
The record contained no IRS W-2 or Form 1099 issued to the beneficiary by the petitioner, so prima facie proof of ability to pay via wages paid was not established.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The record contained no IRS W-2 or Form 1099 issued to the beneficiary by the petitioner, so prima facie proof of ability to pay via wages paid was not established.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_02_B5203; source_row=17817 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Owner's personal resources to supplement corporate ability to pay
Why AAO was not persuaded
USCIS cannot pierce the corporate veil to consider a corporation owner's personal assets. A corporation is a separate and distinct legal entity from its owners, and no documentary evidence of the owner's resources was submitted in any case.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
USCIS cannot pierce the corporate veil to consider a corporation owner's personal assets. A corporation is a separate and distinct legal entity from its owners, and no documentary evidence of the owner's resources was submitted in any case.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_02_B5203; source_row=17820 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Medicine / Clinical
Issue evaluated
NIW · Well positioned
national in scope
Why the evidence was persuasive
The director found that the proposed benefit from employment in the petitioner's occupation is national in scope, and AAO did not disturb this finding.
Why this is useful
Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.
View full reasoning +
The director found that the proposed benefit from employment in the petitioner's occupation is national in scope, and AAO did not disturb this finding.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-09_11_B5203; source_row=17838 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c