Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.
This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.
10,847 decisions /36,849 findings
Showing 20271–20280
EB-1AEB-1A · Published materialNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Published material
published material in major media
Why AAO was not persuaded
The estimated circulation of about 28,000 fell well below the 50,000–200,000 range of popular Iranian daily newspapers, and the petitioner's own submitted background information undermined the expert's claims. The publication was not established to constitute major media on a national or international scale.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The estimated circulation of about 28,000 fell well below the 50,000–200,000 range of popular Iranian daily newspapers, and the petitioner's own submitted background information undermined the expert's claims. The publication was not established to constitute major media on a national or international scale.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-07_02_B2203; source_row=17794 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements
Why AAO was not persuaded
The guild's constitution has a broad definition of qualifying performances and allows membership based on professional production or publication, not outstanding achievement. Additionally, the record does not show that national or international experts judge membership applicants.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The guild's constitution has a broad definition of qualifying performances and allows membership based on professional production or publication, not outstanding achievement. Additionally, the record does not show that national or international experts judge membership applicants.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-07_01_B2203; source_row=17783 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
The petitioner's role as assistant/associate conductor on a large touring production did not demonstrate that he was responsible for the commercial success of the show, and the receipts from another production showed modest ticket sales and weekly grosses far below comparable shows.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The petitioner's role as assistant/associate conductor on a large touring production did not demonstrate that he was responsible for the commercial success of the show, and the receipts from another production showed modest ticket sales and weekly grosses far below comparable shows.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-07_01_B2203; source_row=17791 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
leading or critical role for organizations with distinguished reputation
Why AAO was not persuaded
The size and self-proclaimed innovations of one employer do not establish a distinguished reputation, and USCIS need not rely on an entity's own vague claims of prestige. While a recording group with a platinum debut album had a distinguished reputation, the petitioner failed to show that the group is an organization or establishment for purposes of the criterion.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The size and self-proclaimed innovations of one employer do not establish a distinguished reputation, and USCIS need not rely on an entity's own vague claims of prestige. While a recording group with a platinum debut album had a distinguished reputation, the petitioner failed to show that the group is an organization or establishment for purposes of the criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-07_01_B2203; source_row=17789 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Original contributionsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Original contributions
original contributions of major significance
Why AAO was not persuaded
The letters discuss the petitioner's unique talents and commercial viability of his work, but do not provide specific examples of how his innovations impacted the field as a whole. Commercial viability is not evidence of past significant contributions with an impact on the field.
Why this is useful
Distinguish original work from evidence that the contribution had major significance across the field.
View full reasoning +
The letters discuss the petitioner's unique talents and commercial viability of his work, but do not provide specific examples of how his innovations impacted the field as a whole. Commercial viability is not evidence of past significant contributions with an impact on the field.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-07_01_B2203; source_row=17786 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
serves national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with minimum qualifications
Why AAO was not persuaded
A local shortage of special education teachers does not justify a national interest waiver because the labor certification process addresses local shortages. The petitioner already had an approved labor certification and approved petition, and her credentials (master's degree, full certification) were commonly held in her field. She did not demonstrate influence on the field as a whole.
Why this is useful
See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.
View full reasoning +
A local shortage of special education teachers does not justify a national interest waiver because the labor certification process addresses local shortages. The petitioner already had an approved labor certification and approved petition, and her credentials (master's degree, full certification) were commonly held in her field. She did not demonstrate influence on the field as a whole.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-07_03_B5203; source_row=17803 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Secondary evidence (published articles) lacked probative value because the petitioner did not show primary evidence was unavailable. The organizer's own letter was insufficient to establish national or international recognition beyond those associated with the organizing entity, and the record lacked details such as the number of recipients, selection criteria, and reputation of the organizing panels.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
Secondary evidence (published articles) lacked probative value because the petitioner did not show primary evidence was unavailable. The organizer's own letter was insufficient to establish national or international recognition beyond those associated with the organizing entity, and the record lacked details such as the number of recipients, selection criteria, and reputation of the organizing panels.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-07_02_B2203; source_row=17793 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
EB-1AEB-1A · Final meritsReservedAutomated extraction · broader context
Case facts
Other
Issue evaluated
EB-1A · Final merits
final merits determination
What the decision said
The AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three types of qualifying evidence.
Why this is useful
Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.
View full reasoning +
The AAO declined to conduct a final merits determination because the petitioner did not satisfy the threshold requirement of three types of qualifying evidence.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-07_01_B2203; source_row=17792 Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c