Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20311–20320

NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets minimum experience requirements of labor certification as of priority date

Why the evidence was persuasive

After reviewing the full record including new appeal evidence and RFE responses, the AAO found it more likely than not that the beneficiary had all required education, training, and experience as of the April 13, 2012 priority date.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
After reviewing the full record including new appeal evidence and RFE responses, the AAO found it more likely than not that the beneficiary had all required education, training, and experience as of the April 13, 2012 priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-04-01_01_B5203; source_row=17756
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Scholarly authorshipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Scholarly authorship

authorship of scholarly articles

Why AAO was not persuaded

The evidence did not establish that the publications are professional or major media; circulation claims were unsupported or ambiguous. More importantly, the petitioner's written work does not constitute scholarly articles—it lacks peer review, citations, footnotes, or bibliography, and there is no evidence scholars have taken note of his work.

Why this is useful

See how AAO evaluated whether the work qualified as scholarly authorship and what it showed in the full record.

View full reasoning +
The evidence did not establish that the publications are professional or major media; circulation claims were unsupported or ambiguous. More importantly, the petitioner's written work does not constitute scholarly articles—it lacks peer review, citations, footnotes, or bibliography, and there is no evidence scholars have taken note of his work.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-31_01_B2203; source_row=17748
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

Although the petitioner showed receipt of awards at the 1996, 2000, and 2005 festivals, he did not provide sufficient evidence that these constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards—international participation by competitors is not the same as national or international recognition of the awards themselves.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Although the petitioner showed receipt of awards at the 1996, 2000, and 2005 festivals, he did not provide sufficient evidence that these constitute nationally or internationally recognized prizes or awards—international participation by competitors is not the same as national or international recognition of the awards themselves. Additionally, even if the Best Performer award qualified, the plain language requires plural awards and only one qualifying award was shown.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-31_01_B2203; source_row=17745
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · MembershipNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Membership

membership in associations requiring outstanding achievements

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found that the petitioner established one qualifying membership on appeal by submitting bylaws and supporting letters, but the plain language of the criterion requires membership in qualifying associations in the plural. Because the record lacks evidence of a second qualifying association membership, the criterion is not met.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found that the petitioner established one qualifying membership on appeal by submitting bylaws and supporting letters, but the plain language of the criterion requires membership in qualifying associations in the plural. Because the record lacks evidence of a second qualifying association membership, the criterion is not met.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-31_01_B2203; source_row=17746
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · Artistic displayNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Artistic display

display of work at artistic exhibitions or showcases

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO reversed the director's finding, holding that criterion (vii) is limited to the visual arts under longstanding interpretation upheld by a federal district court. Because the petitioner is a performing artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions, this criterion is not satisfied.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO reversed the director's finding, holding that criterion (vii) is limited to the visual arts under longstanding interpretation upheld by a federal district court. Because the petitioner is a performing artist and has not created tangible pieces of art displayed at exhibitions, this criterion is not satisfied.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-31_01_B2203; source_row=17749
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineNot established

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

Beneficiary holds advanced degree or foreign equivalent

Why AAO was not persuaded

The beneficiary's Philippine Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy is a baccalaureate-level degree per EDGE, which USCIS considers a reliable source. FCCPT's evaluation is not determinative because it assesses aggregate coursework equivalence rather than whether the degree itself is above baccalaureate level, and FCCPT's authority is limited to admissibility credentialing, not the regulatory advanced degree determination.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
The beneficiary's Philippine Bachelor of Science in Physical Therapy is a baccalaureate-level degree per EDGE, which USCIS considers a reliable source. FCCPT's evaluation is not determinative because it assesses aggregate coursework equivalence rather than whether the degree itself is above baccalaureate level, and FCCPT's authority is limited to admissibility credentialing, not the regulatory advanced degree determination. The petitioner did not assert five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience, the only alternative pathway to qualification.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-31_01_B5203; source_row=17751
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed the petitioner did not establish a past record of achievement showing influence on the field as a whole, and held that the temporary debarment of her employer and her status as labor-certification beneficiary do not justify a waiver.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed the petitioner did not establish a past record of achievement showing influence on the field as a whole, and held that the temporary debarment of her employer and her status as labor-certification beneficiary do not justify a waiver.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-31_02_B5203; source_row=17755
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot established

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO withdrew the director's finding, explaining the second prong asks whether the proposed benefit of the petitioner's specific employment is national in scope, not whether the field is. The petitioner did not show her impact extends beyond her school.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding, explaining the second prong asks whether the proposed benefit of the petitioner's specific employment is national in scope, not whether the field is. The petitioner did not show her impact extends beyond her school.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-31_02_B5203; source_row=17754
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

Beneficiary meets minimum job requirements on ETA Form 9089

Why AAO was not persuaded

Because the beneficiary's Philippine bachelor's degree in physical therapy is not the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in physical therapy, the beneficiary fails to meet the minimum education requirement stated on the ETA Form 9089.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Because the beneficiary's Philippine bachelor's degree in physical therapy is not the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in physical therapy, the beneficiary fails to meet the minimum education requirement stated on the ETA Form 9089. Texas licensing requirements from 1999 only confirmed that a CAPTE-accredited program equivalent (which at that time still included baccalaureate programs) and 60 academic semester credits were required, not a master's degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-31_01_B5203; source_row=17752
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed that special education teaching is an area of substantial intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed that special education teaching is an area of substantial intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-31_02_B5203; source_row=17753
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment