Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20361–20370

NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

beneficiary holds foreign equivalent of U.S. master's degree in physical therapy

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agreed with the director's ultimate conclusion but developed substantially expanded reasoning via NOID, addressing FCCPT's coursework-aggregation methodology, EDGE/AACRAO's contrary view of the Philippine bachelor's PT degree, the historical first professional PT degree in the United States, and CAPTE/APTA credit-hour data.…

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director's ultimate conclusion but developed substantially expanded reasoning via NOID, addressing FCCPT's coursework-aggregation methodology, EDGE/AACRAO's contrary view of the Philippine bachelor's PT degree, the historical first professional PT degree in the United States, and CAPTE/APTA credit-hour data. AAO concluded FCCPT's substantial-equivalence determination does not establish a single foreign equivalent degree.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_08_B5203; source_row=17712
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

compliance with notice of filing regulations

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found, on de novo review, that the notice of filing was deficient because it was posted only at one location while the labor certification listed multiple worksites.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO found, on de novo review, that the notice of filing was deficient because it was posted only at one location while the labor certification listed multiple worksites.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_08_B5203; source_row=17713
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Medicine / Clinical

Issue evaluated

other

minimum educational requirement on ETA Form 9089

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO held the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary's Philippine bachelor's degree is the foreign educational equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in physical therapy as required by the ETA Form 9089.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO held the petitioner did not establish that the beneficiary's Philippine bachelor's degree is the foreign educational equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in physical therapy as required by the ETA Form 9089.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_05_B5203; source_row=17708
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the expert opinion letter was merely a claim about citations rather than documentary evidence of them, that web addresses to a subscription database were not verifiable evidence, and that citation evidence not submitted in response to the RFE could not be raised for the first time on appeal.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the expert opinion letter was merely a claim about citations rather than documentary evidence of them, that web addresses to a subscription database were not verifiable evidence, and that citation evidence not submitted in response to the RFE could not be raised for the first time on appeal.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_04_B5203; source_row=17705
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

The AAO did not separately dispute the director's finding that the petitioner's occupation has intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
The AAO did not separately dispute the director's finding that the petitioner's occupation has intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_04_B5203; source_row=17704
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than a U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

The AAO found that the expert opinion letter was from someone with a background in the textile industry with no expertise in contracting management or the petrochemical industry, and thus lacked the requisite corroboration to establish the petitioner's superiority over available U.S. workers.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
The AAO found that the expert opinion letter was from someone with a background in the textile industry with no expertise in contracting management or the petrochemical industry, and thus lacked the requisite corroboration to establish the petitioner's superiority over available U.S. workers.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_04_B5203; source_row=17706
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO does not disturb the director's finding that the proposed area has intrinsic merit.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO does not disturb the director's finding that the proposed area has intrinsic merit.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_03_B5203; source_row=17700
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

serves the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the petitioner has not established a past record of achievement or influence on the field as a whole that would distinguish her from others, and unsupported speculation about future benefits is insufficient.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the petitioner has not established a past record of achievement or influence on the field as a whole that would distinguish her from others, and unsupported speculation about future benefits is insufficient.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_03_B5203; source_row=17702
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO agrees the petitioner did not show her work would be national in scope, noting she submitted no documentary evidence that her past activities affected the U.S. economy at a national level.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO agrees the petitioner did not show her work would be national in scope, noting she submitted no documentary evidence that her past activities affected the U.S. economy at a national level.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_03_B5203; source_row=17701
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO agreed with the director that intrinsic merit is apparent and required no further discussion.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO agreed with the director that intrinsic merit is apparent and required no further discussion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-03-24_02_B5203; source_row=17697
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment