Source-backed decision research

Explore how AAO evaluates evidence.

Search a substantial collection of case-specific reasoning, then narrow it by petition, field, legal issue, or date.

This expanded collection favors source-backed access over perfect automated classification. Fields, labels, summaries, and relevance may contain errors; records marked ‘broader context’ need extra care. Review the cited source before relying on any record. These appeals and motions do not show approval odds or denial rates, and are not legal advice or a prediction.

Clear filters

10,847 decisions / 36,849 findings

Showing 20461–20470

EB-1AEB-1A · AwardsNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Awards

prizes or awards

Why AAO was not persuaded

Academic scholarships are not nationally or internationally recognized prizes in the field of endeavor; selections to perform are not 'prizes or awards'; selection by lottery is not based on excellence; and a collective cast album listing is not the petitioner's individual receipt of an award.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Academic scholarships are not nationally or internationally recognized prizes in the field of endeavor; selections to perform are not 'prizes or awards'; selection by lottery is not based on excellence; and a collective cast album listing is not the petitioner's individual receipt of an award.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-06_01_B2203; source_row=17592
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · JudgingEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · Judging

judging

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO affirmed that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence establishing she meets the plain language of this criterion.

Why this is useful

See how invitations, completed assignments, and the nature of judging were documented and weighed.

View full reasoning +
AAO affirmed that the petitioner submitted sufficient documentary evidence establishing she meets the plain language of this criterion.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-06_01_B2203; source_row=17594
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
EB-1AEB-1A · High remunerationNot pursuedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Other

Issue evaluated

EB-1A · High remuneration

high salary or remuneration

What the decision said

Counsel did not contest the director's findings for this criterion or offer additional arguments on appeal, so the issue is deemed abandoned.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
Counsel did not contest the director's findings for this criterion or offer additional arguments on appeal, so the issue is deemed abandoned.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-06_01_B2203; source_row=17596
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · EB-2 baselineEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

NIW · EB-2 baseline

beneficiary qualifies as advanced degree professional per labor certification

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO finds, based on the entire record including new evidence on motion and RFE response, that the beneficiary held the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in the required field as of the July 18, 2007 priority date.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO finds, based on the entire record including new evidence on motion and RFE response, that the beneficiary held the foreign equivalent of a U.S. master's degree in the required field as of the July 18, 2007 priority date.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-06_01_B5203; source_row=17598
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWotherEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Business / Management

Issue evaluated

other

ability to pay proffered wage

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO concludes the petitioner demonstrated ability to pay the proffered wage as of the closing date before the director.

Why this is useful

Use the reasoning to identify the specific factual or documentary gap AAO considered material.

View full reasoning +
AAO concludes the petitioner demonstrated ability to pay the proffered wage as of the closing date before the director.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-06_01_B5203; source_row=17599
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest substantially greater than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the petitioner failed to show he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications. His letters of support came only from supervisors and educators who lacked specificity about impact on the field, he had only one citation to his work, conference presentations did not demonstrate documented influence, and post-filing job appointme…

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner failed to show he would serve the national interest to a substantially greater degree than an available U.S. worker with the same minimum qualifications. His letters of support came only from supervisors and educators who lacked specificity about impact on the field, he had only one citation to his work, conference presentations did not demonstrate documented influence, and post-filing job appointments could not be considered.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-05_01_B5203; source_row=17587
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO withdrew the director's finding on this prong, concluding that the petitioner's work in food science contributes to U.S. public safety and is therefore national in scope.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO withdrew the director's finding on this prong, concluding that the petitioner's work in food science contributes to U.S. public safety and is therefore national in scope.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-05_01_B5203; source_row=17586
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · National importanceEstablishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

OtherPhD

Issue evaluated

NIW · National importance

substantial intrinsic merit

Why the evidence was persuasive

AAO did not explicitly discuss this prong but implicitly accepted it, consistent with the director's finding that the petitioner qualifies as an advanced degree professional in food science.

Why this is useful

Compare how the decision separates a broadly important field from the prospective impact of the applicant’s specific work.

View full reasoning +
AAO did not explicitly discuss this prong but implicitly accepted it, consistent with the director's finding that the petitioner qualifies as an advanced degree professional in food science.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-05_01_B5203; source_row=17585
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Well positionedNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Well positioned

national in scope

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found no evidence that the benefits of the petitioner's work extended beyond her middle school students to have national impact. Reference letters addressed only local contributions. General arguments about the national importance of education address only the first NYSDOT prong. A local-scale contribution to a national effort does not satisfy NYSDOT.

Why this is useful

Identify the progress, resources, outside interest, or record-to-plan connection that AAO expected to see.

View full reasoning +
AAO found no evidence that the benefits of the petitioner's work extended beyond her middle school students to have national impact. Reference letters addressed only local contributions. General arguments about the national importance of education address only the first NYSDOT prong. A local-scale contribution to a national effort does not satisfy NYSDOT.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-05_02_B5203; source_row=17590
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
NIWNIW · Waiver on balanceNot establishedAutomated extraction · broader context

Case facts

Social Sciences

Issue evaluated

NIW · Waiver on balance

national interest to a substantially greater degree than available U.S. worker

Why AAO was not persuaded

AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate a past record of influence on the field as a whole at a level substantially greater than available U.S. workers. Evidence of exceptional ability (degrees, certifications, memberships, awards) is insufficient to establish NIW eligibility. The petitioner's contributions did not demonstrate national-level significance.

Why this is useful

See which endeavor-specific facts mattered to the waiver analysis beyond a preference to self-petition.

View full reasoning +
AAO found the petitioner failed to demonstrate a past record of influence on the field as a whole at a level substantially greater than available U.S. workers. Evidence of exceptional ability (degrees, certifications, memberships, awards) is insufficient to establish NIW eligibility. The petitioner's contributions did not demonstrate national-level significance.
Exact record locator: findings_long.parquet filename_stem=2014-02-05_02_B5203; source_row=17591
Revision: 081d2cac29dcadfec88fdd675d7a0c4294d72b3c
Open source dataset ↗
← Back to assessment